Handicapping Kansas
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 03:54:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Handicapping Kansas
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Handicapping Kansas  (Read 4066 times)
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,217
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 09, 2012, 11:40:32 PM »

Santorum 54%
Romney 22%
Paul 18%
Gingrich 6%

Santorum wins all four districts and thus all delegates.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 09, 2012, 11:42:03 PM »

Santorum 54%
Romney 22%
Paul 18%
Gingrich 6%

Santorum wins all four districts and thus all delegates.

Paul is too high.  Gingrich is too low.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,074
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 09, 2012, 11:46:42 PM »

52% Rick
35% Mittens
09% Paul
04% Newt
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 09, 2012, 11:48:08 PM »

52% Rick
35% Mittens
09% Paul
04% Newt

I think if you reverse Paul and Newt, you might be right.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,074
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 09, 2012, 11:56:05 PM »

52% Rick
35% Mittens
09% Paul
04% Newt

I think if you reverse Paul and Newt, you might be right.

Ya, I pulled that one out of my ass. I thought, well it is a caucus, so how can Paul go much below 10% even in Kansas, and then I thought about the story that Newt had "abandoned" the state, and maybe caucus types tend to be political junkies, and saw the horrible poll news for Newt coming out of Miss and Alabama, and I thought, well if I have to choose between the two, I'm going to go for keeping Paul close to 10%, and screw Newt - at least in KS ... he's dead.

Have I changed your mind?  Tongue
Logged
Minnesota Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,114


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: March 09, 2012, 11:57:39 PM »

Santorun-57
Romney- 21
Gingrich-12
Paul-10

Delegates-

Santorum- 33
Romney- 7
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,217
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: March 10, 2012, 12:05:38 AM »

Oh the at-large delegates are proportional this time? I guess Santorum doesn't take all delegates then.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: March 10, 2012, 12:42:19 AM »

52% Rick
35% Mittens
09% Paul
04% Newt

I think if you reverse Paul and Newt, you might be right.

Ya, I pulled that one out of my ass. I thought, well it is a caucus, so how can Paul go much below 10% even in Kansas, and then I thought about the story that Newt had "abandoned" the state, and maybe caucus types tend to be political junkies, and saw the horrible poll news for Newt coming out of Miss and Alabama, and I thought, well if I have to choose between the two, I'm going to go for keeping Paul close to 10%, and screw Newt - at least in KS ... he's dead.

Have I changed your mind?  Tongue

No.  Gringrich appeals to some social conservatives and some people remember his from the Speakership.  Further, the news coming out, poll-wise, is not saying Santorum; it is saying Romney.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,578
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: March 10, 2012, 04:14:53 AM »

52% Rick
35% Mittens
09% Paul
04% Newt

I think if you reverse Paul and Newt, you might be right.

How is it you think Paul is only going to 4%?  He got 11% in 2008 and he's improved on his 2008 % in every other state before this.
Logged
argentarius
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 843
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: March 10, 2012, 05:50:42 AM »

Oh the at-large delegates are proportional this time? I guess Santorum doesn't take all delegates then.
Proportional for those who get 20%. I think Newt will get maybe 7% or something, Paul has spent enough time in the state to get 15%, and this leaves Santorum needing 60 to get the sweep. And I don't put it past him. I don't know how some of you predict Romney to do better here, in his worst state in the country imo, than he's doing in the Gallup poll.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: March 10, 2012, 10:33:21 AM »

Santorum wins by less than ten points.  Romney-2, Paul-3.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,074
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: March 10, 2012, 10:48:02 AM »

52% Rick
35% Mittens
09% Paul
04% Newt

I think if you reverse Paul and Newt, you might be right.

How is it you think Paul is only going to 4%?  He got 11% in 2008 and he's improved on his 2008 % in every other state before this.

Yes, it would be better if one could have percentages that add up to 110% rather than 100% I admit. Something had to give, and I went with the two front runners dominating. Anyway, I would be amazed if Mittens fell below 30%, and I doubt it will be that low. But who knows. I am flying on instinct.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,578
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: March 10, 2012, 02:25:16 PM »

52% Rick
35% Mittens
09% Paul
04% Newt

I think if you reverse Paul and Newt, you might be right.

How is it you think Paul is only going to 4%?  He got 11% in 2008 and he's improved on his 2008 % in every other state before this.

Yes, it would be better if one could have percentages that add up to 110% rather than 100% I admit. Something had to give, and I went with the two front runners dominating. Anyway, I would be amazed if Mittens fell below 30%, and I doubt it will be that low. But who knows. I am flying on instinct.

That was directed more toward JJ than you. 9% for Paul is definitely a bit more realistic. Tongue
Logged
NHI
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: March 10, 2012, 03:35:59 PM »

Santorum wins... ugh!

Santorum: 53%
Romney: 17%
Gingrich: 15%
Paul: 13%


Per. CNN
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,578
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: March 10, 2012, 04:03:42 PM »

Santorum wins... ugh!

Santorum: 53%
Romney: 17%
Gingrich: 15%
Paul: 13%


Per. CNN

Those aren't the final numbers. The vote is still coming in.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: March 10, 2012, 04:17:05 PM »
« Edited: March 10, 2012, 04:21:48 PM by Mr. Morden »

Anyway, I would be amazed if Mittens fell below 30%, and I doubt it will be that low.

How do you feel about ~20%?
Logged
I'm JewCon in name only.
Klecly
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.61, S: 6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: March 10, 2012, 04:19:43 PM »

Yea I pick Santorum to win Kansas big time.

Hopefully a win here gives Santorum some momentum in AL, MS because we are struggling there.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.226 seconds with 13 queries.