2004 Presidential Results of the wealthiest county in each state (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 12:23:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  2004 Presidential Results of the wealthiest county in each state (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2004 Presidential Results of the wealthiest county in each state  (Read 19892 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,802
United Kingdom


« on: May 07, 2007, 05:37:36 PM »

I don't really think that per-capita income is a good measure of how wealthy a given area is; I think on per-capita income, the wealthiest county in NY is New York (Manhtten) ? Which is an absurdity when you consider quite how poor large tracts of the borough are (in both relative and *absolute* terms).
IMO a wealthy area shouldn't include large numbers of poor (or even working class!) people.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,802
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2007, 07:04:31 PM »

I don't really think that per-capita income is a good measure of how wealthy a given area is; I think on per-capita income, the wealthiest county in NY is New York (Manhtten) ? Which is an absurdity when you consider quite how poor large tracts of the borough are (in both relative and *absolute* terms).
IMO a wealthy area shouldn't include large numbers of poor (or even working class!) people.

Well, then you're going to have a great deal of difficulty with some states; looking at that list, many states' highest per capita income counties are below the national average (~$35,000)!

Affluence is (up to a point) relative.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,802
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2007, 10:36:59 AM »

The percentage of poor in Manhattan is much lower than in rural areas, or even in Brooklyn, even if you adjust for cost of living.

Of course it's lower than in Brooklyn; but that's not exactly hard. But in Manhatten 17.6% of families live below the poverty line (2000 Census). Compared with 9.2% nationally. That's rather high.

But here's the problem in Manhatten; in 2000 as much as 9% of households earned over $200,000 a year. Meanwhile, as much as 14% earned under $10,000.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

That depends how you define wealthy doesn't it?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Surrey is certainly the wealthiest county in England. There are a few pockets which can't be described as wealthy o/c (though that's really all they are; pockets) and some areas are richer than others. But it's not really comparable with, say, Manhatten as far as this goes. A better comparision would be with somewhere like Islington; which has one of the highest average wages in the U.K, but some of the highest IMD (ie; deprivation) figures also.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.