IDS1: Legislature Size Adjustment Act (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 02:06:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  IDS1: Legislature Size Adjustment Act (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IDS1: Legislature Size Adjustment Act  (Read 833 times)
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« on: December 29, 2013, 05:40:24 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: SJoyce
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2013, 05:55:17 PM »

This legislation would create a variable-sized legislature to create more interesting elections. Class A would contract to only one legislator when three or fewer candidates have declared their intentions to run, and three when four or more have declared (this is largely based on the Mideast law that implemented their variable-sized legislature, but due to our different classes I had to make it one or three to ensure an odd-numbered legislature). It would also ensure dynamic competition in the Class B seats by electing them from two different districts. I'm not entirely certain that this is the form of the bill that I want, so I'm open to all amendments.


Amendment is friendly.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2013, 07:22:29 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This amendment incorporates Small L's and PiT's suggestions - 24 hours to object, otherwise it will be adopted.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2013, 07:53:12 AM »

     I would also like to make the districts be redrawn periodically (yearly?), to account for changes in the distribution of population. Here is some language that I had written up on the matter. I am open to changing whatever the Legislators think should be changed.

I like them being redrawn yearly, but I question whether we need to create another elected position to do so - maybe headed by the Emperor and two appointed by the Emperor and confirmed by the Legislature?
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2013, 10:16:43 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Previous amendment has been adopted. 24 hours for objections to the new amendment.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2013, 06:43:46 PM »

Are we ready for a final vote here?
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2013, 06:46:46 PM »

We do have a 72-hour minimum debate time, but I'll begin the 24 hours now to wait for objections to a final vote.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #7 on: January 01, 2014, 07:07:55 PM »

Seeing no objections, a final vote is now in order on the Legislature Size Adjustment Act.



Aye.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #8 on: January 01, 2014, 08:55:31 PM »

This bill has enough votes to pass. 48 hours to change votes (or add votes).
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2014, 10:32:50 PM »

With a vote of 4-0 with 1 not voting, this bill has passed the Legislature and is presented to the Emperor for his signature or veto.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2014, 09:45:45 AM »

This bill confuses me.  Are all candidates for Legislature going to run in districts?  I'm not sure if the first draft of the bill was written out by the last amendment.

No, only Class B will run in districts. Class A are still at-large.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.