The general sentiment is pretty good but that's still a stupid writing full of bad examples and inaccuracies. This part made me cringe:
"There is no travel ban on them because of their religion."
There isn't for anybody. It could've been accurate and just as relevant changing "religion" to "national origin" so why not do that?
Probably because many of us think Trump's ban has nothing to do with the nations in question and everything to do with religion. I.e he couldn't ban Muslims, so he did the closest thing to that that he could get away with.
