"Shocking" secret service tell-all just as you'd expect (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 05:48:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  "Shocking" secret service tell-all just as you'd expect (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: "Shocking" secret service tell-all just as you'd expect  (Read 2199 times)
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


« on: August 14, 2014, 04:22:06 PM »

Honestly, I think Bush 41 was one of the best men to ever be president. You can talk about the policies, but he's objectively a pretty good guy. He cares about family, and he doesn't care what a person's family looks like. More Republicans should take his lead.

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

HP
Logged
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2014, 04:01:27 PM »
« Edited: August 15, 2014, 04:03:04 PM by Nagas »

Find me a video of Bush saying that quote, Nagas. Then we'll talk.

Roll Eyes

There was no video recorded at the event. The lack of a physical recording does cut into the quote's authenticity I admit, but the written correspondence after the fact leads credence to its authenticity. Bush has never denied the quote and page 39 of the correspondence suggests that it is something he could have said. Even if the actual quote is fabricated, the lack of denial and what was written is pretty indicative of his views toward that segment of the population.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You get props not when you're out of office or when its politically expedient, but when you're in a position to actually affect change and policy (for the record, not a fan of Obama doing this to get elected) at risk to you or your party's electoral prospects. He was not an ally toward the LBGT community nor the non-religious community during his tenure. Still, his reversal on gay marriage (at least a lesbian one, which is less stigmatized than a male-male, but we'll give him the benefit of the doubt), is of course welcome.

Granted, he is a better Republican than the bulk of the party that exists today, and most of what his personality was should be emulated. His domestic policies and utter aloofness to domestic issues, less so.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 10 queries.