In all fairness she's hardly just going to pick the first 10 women off the street...
Exactly. It's not like America doesn't have 5 very capable and experienced women for a presidential cabinet.
It's also not like the best possible choices for most of the cabinet positions aren't men. It's not anything wrong with women as a group; there just aren't as many women at the very top levels of government, academia and industry. Would you rather have the absolute most capable and experienced cabinet member or a reasonably capable and experienced member who's also a woman?
What I want is very simple, I want her to do the best job she can without taking gender into consideration in her decisions. Is a woman the best possible pick for Attorney General? Pick the woman. Is a woman the best possible pick for Secretary of State? Pick the woman. But if a man is the best possible choice, pick the man. I don't care. Just don't pick the woman when the man is the best possible choice solely because you want your cabinet to be gender-balanced.
If we keep doing this, other countries that don't do it are going to end up with stronger cabinets and outperform us.
It's really absurd that you think there is actually one objective best pick for a given job. It speaks to the biases that prevent women from being recognized.