Does increased urbanization hurt the Democrats in the House? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 01:34:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Does increased urbanization hurt the Democrats in the House? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Does increased urbanization hurt the Democrats in the House?  (Read 3725 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« on: October 17, 2013, 01:32:41 AM »

It definitely does. But of course if a democrats is drawing the lines, they will combine less D suburbs to make more D districts (IE Illinoi), and pretty much "pack" big rural republican chunks in a few districts, so it depends . If a republican draws the lines, they will "pack" urban areas into a few districts, and combine suburbs and rural areas to make maximum amount of districts (IE Pennsylvania). I would say when its all equal though, it absolutely does hurt them, as packed urban areas are much more D than rural areas are R. And many times, its unavoidable to pack extremely democratic districts, while you can almost always combine something other than rural land into a district. So I think the answer is yes.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.