Why not practically double the ELECTORAL COLLEGE to 1100? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 10:25:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why not practically double the ELECTORAL COLLEGE to 1100? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why not practically double the ELECTORAL COLLEGE to 1100?  (Read 11502 times)
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,538
Ukraine


« on: June 04, 2008, 11:04:13 PM »

I will say this much about this debate, few people on this board understand the EC.  Not only did the founders not trust the poeple (there are just too many voters with about 2 brain cells a piece who should do their country a favor and not vote), but they didn't want only the major population centers to determine the presidential election.

Do you honestly think any presidential candidate would pay any attention to Wyoming, the Dakotas,  or the People's Republic of Vermont if their were no EC giving them any real input in the election.  Some might argued they are largely ignored now besides maybe a primary election or two but just wait when our presidential election is simply decide by New York city, LA, Chicago, Houston and Dallas (and maybe a hand full of other cities).
they don't pay attention to them now!
And the media would crucify a candidate who only campaigned in NYC, LA, etc.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.