NPVIC - Is it constitutional? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 01:44:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  NPVIC - Is it constitutional? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NPVIC - Is it constitutional?  (Read 749 times)
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,288
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
« on: July 08, 2021, 12:34:59 AM »

I think the compact aspect of it is irrelevant. States have plenary power to choose the manner of appointing electors. You can look to McPherson v. Blacker (1892) and, more recently, 2020's Chiafalo v. Washington. In the latter, the Court ruled unanimously that states can penalize electors for voting contrary to how a state wishes and also that states can replace electors that do not vote according to the laws of the state. In McPherson, the Court ruled that there is no constitutional requirement for states to assign their electors to the winner of the popular vote in their respective states.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 8 queries.