Score The Vote Party (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 02, 2024, 04:34:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Score The Vote Party (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Score The Vote Party  (Read 410 times)
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,780
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« on: February 24, 2021, 02:28:13 AM »

The most recent presidential election may have been the most toxic in Atlasia's history. Moreover, it only reaffirmed the two party domination that has long dominated Atlasia (even if one of the top two candidates was nominally independent). The last time the third place candidate in a presidential election got more than 10% of the first preference vote was 4 elections ago, and the last time they got more than 20% of the vote was 9 elections ago. Ranked Choice Voting has allowed elections to erode the civility and unity of our republican while choking the life out of minor parties and candidates. Voters are fed up with status quo Atlasia politics. The Score the Vote Party exists to provide them with an alternative.

Our raison d'être is to implement score voting nationwide. Under score voting, voters will rate each candidate they have an opinion on from 1-10, and the candidate with the highest average score will win. Unlike RCV, score voting considers the totality of voter preferences at once rather than just their highest preference for a non-eliminated candidate. It also wouldn't force voters to arbitrarily give a preference for any given candidate over another, reducing the toxicity of our politics.

Our party's primary goal is to implement score voting for all single winner elections in all levels of Atlasia government. Secondarily, we call for implementing a cardinal PR method for all multi-winner elections in Atlasia. We specifically endorse Single Distributed Vote (SDV) for such elections, but consider any cardinal proportional representation method acceptable. These systems should be implemented simultaneously to avoid the confusion that would result from a ballot using both score voting and STV for different races.

The Score The Vote party does not have an official position on whether or not a constitutional convention should happen but calls for an constitutional convention that does happen to enshrine score voting into the new constitution. Being a single-issue party composed of reform-minded members from across the political spectrum, the Score The Vote party does not have a stated position on any other issues in Atlasia that aren't directly related to the voting system our elections are held under.


End the toxic duopoly. Score The Vote.
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,780
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2021, 02:37:00 AM »

Interesting idea! Devil's advocate: in the present environment of extreme partisanship, wouldn't people just rank their first choice a "10" and every other candidate "0" in order to inflate their average score?
That becomes a bad strategy as soon as there are more than two viable candidates and the race could end up being between "acceptable but not preferred frontrunner" and "least preferred frontrunner", since you give up having a say if they end up higher scored than your favorite. The present state of perpetually only having two viable candidates is a result of using RCV (or rather, any system that encourages favorite betrayal) and even in a partisan environment it should go away with score voting as more ideologically similar candidates feel like it's worth it for them to run.
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,780
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2021, 02:46:34 AM »

Interesting idea! Devil's advocate: in the present environment of extreme partisanship, wouldn't people just rank their first choice a "10" and every other candidate "0" in order to inflate their average score?

A more interesting way if one wanted to do this is to allocate each person say 100 points.
Giving a candidate they like a 1 costs 1 vote while 2 points would be 4. 3 Points would be 9 and so forth.  Would make deals interesting such as 2 similar candidates working on giving each others voters a 7 each or something. I am guessing a scale of 0 to 5 and 25 points would work better .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_voting
Quadratic voting is actually horrible to the point where I'd actively campaign against it even if the only options were it and FPTP. Falls apart in the presence of collusion between voters (which our election infrastructure is particularly ill-suited to combat) and fails key election criteria like independence of clones.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 11 queries.