Assuming Clinton can only seriously compete in one Romney 2012 state....

[JRP1994]

I vote Arizona

[ElectionsGuy]

Yeah, its Arizona. Though good luck getting those suburban whites in the Phoenix  metro to vote for Hillary (since that's what she needs).

[MasterJedi]

Arizona, if she could get the Hispanic community to fully turn out or turn out en masse she could flip the state.

[RR1997]

In order from most likely to go for Hillary to the least likely:

1. Arizona

2. Georgia


3. Missouri




4. Indiana

[Xing]

Arizona. Trump's atrocious numbers with Latinos really could make it competitive.

[Kingpoleon]

1. Arizona
2. Alaska
3. Indiana

[Pragmatic Conservative]

1. Arizona,53% Chance of winning
2. Missouri,45% Chance at winning
3. Georgia,44% Chance of winning
4. Indiana,37% Chance of winning

[ProudModerate2]

I voted Arizona.
But keep wondering that if between her, Bill and Obama .... that if they push hard in Georgia (part of the south), they can take it.

[Fargobison]

AZ with GA close behind....anything else is a waste of time.

[IceSpear]

Arizona (sane)

[IceSpear]

AZ with GA close behind....anything else is a waste of time.

I think GA is the biggest waste of time out of these 4. MO/IN are huge longshots and could only fall in a wave, but at least they have persuadable voters. GA is completely inelastic and racially polarized. The best heavy investment could do is keep it relatively close, and in the electoral college close doesn't matter. I can't see her winning it, short of a Goldwater-esque Trump collapse.

[Fubart Solman]

Well, she's only down by 3 in Utah...

[Sir Mohamed]

Voted GA, but AZ is also worth a try.

[Boston Bread]

AZ, because the senate race is winnable if turnout increases. Even if Clinton wins GA the senate race is still lean R due to a likely runoff.

[°Leprechaun]

Hard to say so I went with Missouri. Georgia is the best in terms of electoral votes, the other three are equal.

edit: none of them are as important as the real swing states of course (OH,VA,FL)

[°Leprechaun]

I never really understood why Obama wanted to win Indiana.

[Santander]

I never really understood why Obama wanted to win Indiana.

It was next door and polling looked promising.

[°Leprechaun]

I never really understood why Obama wanted to win Indiana.

It was next door and polling looked promising.

It was interesting that he won, considering how Republican the state is. VA & CO also used to be safe for Republicans but now are key swing states.

[ProudModerate2]

I never really understood why Obama wanted to win Indiana.

It was next door and polling looked promising.

It was interesting that he won, considering how Republican the state is. VA & CO also used to be safe for Republicans but now are key swing states.

The entire nation, like our entire planet Earth, is slowly trending more "liberal."
This is nothing new, and completely transparent.
Think about it ..... for thousands of years, nations, governments and especially laws and rights, have all trended more and more "liberal" as time continues to tick.

[Higgs]

Arizona, but really her only chance at taking a Romney state is North Carolina. Even there it's doubtful she beats Trump.

[HillOfANight]

I never really understood why Obama wanted to win Indiana.

Because he could, and it helped with the mandate narrative

[Kleine Scheiße]

Arizona and Missouri are the only sensible strategies.

[🦀🎂🦀🎂]

I never really understood why Obama wanted to win Indiana.

It was next door and polling looked promising.

It was interesting that he won, considering how Republican the state is. VA & CO also used to be safe for Republicans but now are key swing states.

The entire nation, like our entire planet Earth, is slowly trending more "liberal."
This is nothing new, and completely transparent.
Think about it ..... for thousands of years, nations, governments and especially laws and rights, have all trended more and more "liberal" as time continues to tick.

This is whiggish history on steroids.