Strange, given that US spending on the government education industry complex dwarfs Japan on a per capita basis.
But I suppose they don't have a moocher problem.
I really love it when you present cherry-picked statistics that demonstrate once again the adage that there are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
In both Korea and Japan, there is such an extensive system of privately-funded tutoring to make up for the deficiencies of their public education system that only those unable to afford it fail to get their children private tutoring on a scale Kaplan would kill to even get a fraction of that if you add those costs, Korea and Japan are actually spending more per capita than the US. As for including Luxembourg as one of the cherries, it's absurdly high GDP means that on a percentage of GDP basis it spends about three-fourths that of the US.
Yeah, there are problems with American education, but your monomania on moochers as being the root cause of the problem to the level of ignoring all other causes just does not stand up to scrutiny, krazen.
It is certainly strange to see a liberal explain the merits of a private sector model, especially in this industry.
But of course, there are oranges, apples, and grapes. And there is comparing apples to oranges and calling both grapes. Boosting the Japan side by accounting for private spending while failing to do the same for the United States is certainly one of the above. In the United States our massive public sector figures are only
70% of the total; 30% comes elsewhere. We are right there with both nations in this
category.
Or, perhaps you'd prefer this graph, which adds up public and private spending.
Congratulations. We are still Goliath. But that's the point, isn't it?