Why when americans protest government health care...

[politicaladdict]

Why is it when americans riot agianst stupid government-controlled insurance and healthcare, idiot statist liberals consider this group a mob orchestrated from insurance companies,especially when this is happening around the country, when some are democrats, when some are asking good questions(maybe a little without them yelling but other than that) ahd libs can't even ask a sincere question?

But when a black conservative from St Louise gets beat up by bunch of union mobs and when an old lady gets pushed up against a wall by more union mobs, and when a guy gets his shirt ripped open and chest cut, that's just OK, right?

If it's anything, it's these trade union jerks being orchestrated by probably liberal politicians and if not by politicians, Obama and libs politicians certainly ain't really doing anything to help out it.

SO, WHO'S THE MOB?

[politicaladdict]

I'm just saying I don't see our politicians condemning it. Please show me a link to a liberal politician(s) condemning it and I'll have some second thoughts.

Plus, these libs accuse the american people being the mob and this just makes it seem that the libs are against the people.

And I don't see the liberal media covering this. Can you show me if any lib news is covering this kind coverage?

[politicaladdict]

Well, the union libs for one.

And why do conservatives condemn it more? OH... because we're the mob?

No actual liberal will come out and say they're praising it, they just don't make it as serious of a matter as it is. I mean, trade unions are mostly Obama supporters, right? and that's probably why the liberal news media don't cover the story, atleasts, I don't see coverage.

[politicaladdict]

I'm just saying I don't see our politicians condemning it. Please show me a link to a liberal politician(s) condemning it and I'll have some second thoughts.

Plus, these libs accuse the american people being the mob and this just makes it seem that the libs are against the people.

And I don't see the liberal media covering this. Can you show me if any lib news is covering this kind coverage?

So, if you can call us "libs", then we can just call you a "sh**thead".

Why can't sh**theads like you find a link or a quote from another poster where they approved of union violence against people.

And how does bringing up union violence (without any cited evidence) justify the angry mobs encouraged by your ditto sh**theads on con-talk radio that are destroying civilized debate on our nations healthcare... other than to distract from the issue.

It's pretty obvious as well that your party lost the last election, and that healthcare was a pretty big issue (though not the biggest).  If the American people were so damn opposed to what the Democrats are pushing, then why have they overwhelmingly won the past two elections?  Why isn't John Boner the one making these decisions instead of Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama?

Stop being the party of no and start offering your own f**king ideas.  Otherwise pull your panties out of your ass crack and find a less porous argument.

Well, the actual sh*thead is you, because you come out of an ASS, which is the symbol of DEMOQUACK PARTY!

And I bring up mob violence because liberals like to call us mobs especially when we're not being violent,  but when unions attack it's not as serious. I was  just wondering what you SH*THEADS from an ASS thought about it.

How bout when Raegan won by an even bigger landslide. It's because it's been a bad year for republicans mainly because of the Iraq War the libs also distorted in there precious media and a few other things, but don't worry, WE'LL COMEBACK! And health care is an even bigger debate right now. Plus, didn't Obama, when getting elected, promise he'd cut taxes for most americans(which is a conservative thing) and didn't he say unemployment wouldn't go past 8% when they passed the phony stimulus and his number ARE deteriating and this ain't what people asked for.

Why would I wanna be the party of changing this nation into a socialist one. We ain't the party of nothing, we're pretty much  the party of what america forefathers stood for. We don't need any socialist ideas and that's what this Obama creep is, A MARXIST!

[politicaladdict]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8194485.stm

I think the DNC ad embedded in this article is great.  It's time we gave the Republicans a little taste of their own medicine.

I get it, a peaceful protest is set up and it's our fault americans get beat up because we're expressing free-speech.

I assume you thought the TEA-PARTY was a set up, too.

[politicaladdict]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8194485.stm

I think the DNC ad embedded in this article is great.  It's time we gave the Republicans a little taste of their own medicine.

I get it, a peaceful protest is set up and it's our fault americans get beat up because we're expressing free-speech.

I assume you thought the TEA-PARTY was a set up, too.

Actually the TEA-PARTY was OUR IDEA until the moralfag Faux news squad hijacked it.

WHAT! How did Fox News hijack it?

[politicaladdict]

Fox New is anti high-taxes and so are people, so what!

[politicaladdict]

Fox New is anti high-taxes and so are people, so what!

You are aware that Obama passed the largest middle-class tax cut in history, right?

Fox New is anti high-taxes and so are people, so what!

You are aware that Obama passed the largest middle-class tax cut in history, right?

WHAT THE HECK!

The stimulus, which cost trillions, is NOT a tax-cut for middle-class, and it's funny that the government can determine class. Besides, he kept changing the kind of income people he'll tax.

YYAAAAAYYYY.. we're out of the recession because Obama gave huge a tax-cuts.
forget the rising unemployment, more people losing there jobs and Obama giving what socialibs like to calls a tax-cut.

If it's anything, Obama is for ECONOMIC-CUTS.

And about Crap-for-Clunkers that was going out of busniess(government-controlled) just means government can't run a corporations.

[politicaladdict]

Plus, didn't Obama, when getting elected, promise he'd cut taxes for most americans(which is a conservative thing) and didn't he say unemployment wouldn't go past 8% when they passed the phony stimulus and his number ARE deteriating and this ain't what people asked for.

FTR, the vast majority of Americans have already received a tax cut as part of the stimulus. FACT!

Yes, unemployment has exceeded 8% but in case you hadn't noticed, George W Bush bequeathed him the 'Great Recession' which has been haemorrhaging jobs at a rate not seen since the recession of 1981-82 (aye, that of your sainted Reagan)

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You are totally divorced from reality when it comes to this president and his policies. And you  can get over your Obama Derangement Syndrome as well

The stimulus, which cost trillions

$787bn actually. $288bn of which were tax cuts. Thicko

If it's anything, Obama is for ECONOMIC-CUTS.

Aye, like that would stand him in good stead for re-election

Would it please you to know that in the post-Depression era, it has been Democratic presidents, rather than Republicans, who have presided over more 1) robust economic growth and 2) job creation; as well with a more equitable rise in prosperity across all income groups

And about Crap-for-Clunkers that was going out of busniess(government-controlled) just means government can't run a corporations.

No, far from going out of business, Cash-for-Clunkers proved to be a successful initiative, so much so that it required supplemental appropriations to finance it

Analysts predict billions in benefits from 'Cash for Clunkers'

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/08/07/cash.for.clunkers/index.html

Story Highlights

-Analysts: $3 billion for program may provide $18 billion boost for economy
-Critics: Program just shifts consumer spending from one area to another
-Consumers save in gas, maintenance; auto industry sells twice as many cars

Indeed, 77 House Republicans voted in favor of it. It's reassuring to know that some Republicans actually do give a dam about American jobs and livelihoods dependent on the auto industry

OH, I GET IT... IT'S BUSH'S FAULT THAT OBAMA LIED ABOUT UNEMPLOYMENT NOT GOING FROM 8% AFTER HE PASSED THE STIMULUS!

Stop playing the blaim Bush game because this is Obama's economy now and he ain't done nothing to stimulate the economy with a BIG, FAT HUMONGOUS STIMULUS. Just the government.

[politicaladdict]

Paragraph from wikipedia about a republican up  falsly claimed to be beat up because of political reasons.

"In October 2008, Ashley Todd, a volunteer for the U.S. presidential campaign of Republican John McCain, falsely claimed to have been the victim of robbery and politically motivated physical assault by a supporter of McCain's Democratic opponent Barack Obama. The story broke less than two weeks before the 2008 United States presidential election on November 4. Todd later confessed to inventing the story after surveillance photos and a polygraph test were presented. She was charged with filing a false police report and sentenced to two years in jail."

Wow.. I remember seeing this story on CNN in a restaurant when I was eating. I happen to see this on Fox News, aswell, like The O'Reilly Factor.

But when it's real leftist unions, beating up a conservative black guy... YES, black guy, then I only hear  this on Fox News.

It's just more crap from the donkey-left network who likes to crap-out when IT makes the republicans look bad.

[politicaladdict]

OH, I GET IT... IT'S BUSH'S FAULT THAT OBAMA LIED ABOUT UNEMPLOYMENT NOT GOING FROM 8% AFTER HE PASSED THE STIMULUS!

That wasn't a lie. That was what I call too optimistic a projection

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Obama hasn't been in office long for his policies to have had much effect one way or the other - and the simple truth of the matter is that Obama was bequeathed an economy that was haemorrhaging jobs at a rate not seen since the recession of 1981-82. Remember the one you right wing dogmatoids forever blamed on Carter. Yet using your reasoning, that recession can only have been Reagan's (and it was)

But if Bush would have called it an optimistic a projection, than that's a lie, right?

Obama has been in Office long enough and there's already massive protests against governmen-controlled health caere, already, NOT SET-UP!
He's done so much such as nationalized GM and Chrysler and had a stupid program Cash-for-Clunkers that was close to go out of business but founded by more tax-payer money and also used a big fat stimulus  and yet to see any improvement and unemployment is goin up more still.

So, Obama done so much to the economy WITHOUT getting hardly anyone out.

Bush's rating were higher than Obama in th same amount of time in office.

[politicaladdict]

Bush's rating were higher than Obama in th same amount of time in office.

All that tells me is that Obama is being held to a higher standard

What that tells me and alot americans is that Obama owns more of the economy than Bush.