Energy for the Future Bill 2014 (Debating) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 04:01:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Energy for the Future Bill 2014 (Debating) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Energy for the Future Bill 2014 (Debating)  (Read 3504 times)
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« on: September 11, 2014, 11:13:50 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: Senator Polnut



Senator, you have 24 hours to make your case here.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2014, 04:12:59 PM »

I think this is a fine bill, Polnut, and it has my tentative support. Like Senator Cranberry, I too have concerns as far as both the use of nuclear power and natural gas are concerned, but I am willing to swallow those if it means we can put energy independence and energy affordability back in the national dialogue.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2014, 04:16:24 PM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.



Offering this to clarify a few things as well as make the text flow a little better. Would you consider this amendment friendly or hostile, Senator Polnut?
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2014, 04:18:12 PM »

I would just say nuclear energy is the long-term energy solution right in front of our noses.

Fusion-based nuclear power, yes. Fisson-based power, not so much.

And Polnut, I was under the assumption that this bill was about research and development. At least that's what I got from my reading of it. What am I off on there?
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2014, 08:56:15 PM »

I am willing to withdraw the amendment I have proposed.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2014, 10:58:03 AM »

Nay
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2014, 01:20:04 PM »

I object to the amendment. There's no reason to pander to those who wish to undermine the intent of this bill when we have the votes to the contrary.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #7 on: September 24, 2014, 09:53:19 AM »

I object to the amendment. There's no reason to pander to those who wish to undermine the intent of this bill when we have the votes to the contrary.
Why do you consider 20% to be an ideal figure?

Because it's a higher figure, compared to what is being offered now. The more money we can throw into research and development, the better.

NAY
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2014, 01:01:57 PM »

Energy capture and storage devices, for one. Personally I'm fine with throwing as much money as we can at renewable energy. I tend to think that we should leave the Earth in a better condition for those who come after us than those who came before us did for us.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #9 on: September 29, 2014, 05:54:50 AM »

I'm pleased to see the Senate vote down the watering down of this bill. We can and should do better for ourselves and future generations.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #10 on: September 29, 2014, 06:50:07 AM »

I second the motion of the sponsor.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #11 on: September 29, 2014, 01:42:14 PM »

Aye
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2014, 04:03:25 AM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 10 queries.