99.05%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 08:42:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  99.05%
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: 99.05%  (Read 5216 times)
MN-Troy
Rookie
**
Posts: 183


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 11, 2004, 09:50:49 PM »

As an example, exactly one Senator voted against PATRIOT.  (The one I voted to re-elect ;-) )


What's wrong with the Patriot Act?


I assume you're asking what's wrong with the Patriot Act?


I believe I asked that question, right? (see above).. Moving on

The source for the confusion is that you messed up the attributions.

Give me specifics though of what is wrong with the Patriot Act?

In particular, it gives law enforcement broad new powers of surveillance, allowing them to circumvent our 4th Amendment rights against unreasonable search and siezure without due process (a warrant).  For example, the cops could monitor what you check out from the library, simply on suspicion that you are a "terrorist," and no judge need be involved.

First and foremost the power to search library records pertaining to a criminal investigation has been around for a long time. The Patriot Act extended this power to counter terrorism investigation. But more importantly both investigations require a Grand Jury authorization to subpoena records. Unless there has been a case where that power has been abused (judge did not issue a warrant), I like to hear it.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.218 seconds with 12 queries.