Why did Bush do so well in Conneticutt? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 11:31:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Bush do so well in Conneticutt? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Bush do so well in Conneticutt?  (Read 2791 times)
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

« on: November 04, 2004, 09:37:22 AM »

Going back a long way, Connecticut has consistently been several points more Republican in presidential elections than New York, Massachusetts or Rhode Island.  Fairfield and Litchfield Counties are the most Republican counties in the state.

As Bush did better in New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts than he did in 2000, the same was true of Connecticut.  It could partly be the effect of 9/11, or maybe just that unlike last time, he is an incumbent and a known quanitity, as opposed to somebody challenging a member of a fairly well-liked administration.

All in all, the Connecticut results are about the same in relation to surrounding states.  Kerry performed several points lower than in New York (54% vs. 58%), just as in 2000 with Gore (56% vs. 60%).

It's a fairly predictable result.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 11 queries.