Senate Residency Requirement Amendment (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 06:12:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Senate Residency Requirement Amendment (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Senate Residency Requirement Amendment  (Read 6033 times)
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« on: May 19, 2005, 08:55:21 PM »
« edited: May 19, 2005, 08:59:51 PM by Senator "Pedro" King »

I am personally against this as it discourages new membership (MasterJedi, Milk_and_Cereal, True Democrat, Yaks Hairbrush, Miss Catholic, and BenMeyers would all have to drop out). Also, what about redistricting and regional changes?  These people have to wait 2 months to seek election in their new district or region.

This is a poorly written amendment
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2005, 09:04:47 PM »

I agree that it is poorly written, but I think there is something we can still work with here.  What about a requirement that states that no one shall move from one district/region to another and run for the Senate, for two months.  Thus, all the newbies are covered.

Still, my point is open to interpretation with that change.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2005, 11:03:05 PM »

Judging from previous experience with the Supreme Court, we must write this clause to have such a tight intepretation that the best attorney in the country couldn't find his way around it.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2005, 11:16:07 PM »

I think the Senate should just stay out of this.  The government banning active, willing, and supported forum members from running is just undemocratic.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2005, 10:08:42 PM »

Aye. 


P.S.  I still plan on voting against this, but if it does pass might as well make it decent.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2005, 02:18:20 PM »

Nay.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2005, 02:42:38 PM »

This amendment now has enough votes to fail; senators now have 24 hours to change their votes.


We still need on more Aye:

Aye 1
Nay 4
Abstain 1
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2005, 02:46:41 PM »

This amendment now has enough votes to fail; senators now have 24 hours to change their votes.


We still need on more Aye:

Aye 1
Nay 4
Abstain 1

It's a constitutional amendment; 4 out of 9 is 44% against, and constitutional amendments only need greater than 33% against.

Ah, I forgot about super-majorities! Wink

I'm surprised this doesn't have more support than it does.  It's the best deterrent against carpet-bagging I can think of.

The language is hard to avoid (people would still have to wait 2 months after redistricting to run if they get changed) and it is my personal belief the Senate shouldn't put more restrictions on who can't and can run after we had an election with nothing but unopposed races.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2005, 12:51:38 PM »

You are looking at this all wrong Soulty: the Republican government didn't fail, the Libertarian government succeeded.

Populists
Supersoulty
PBrunsel
MasterJedi
Cosmo Kramer

Libertarians
ColinW
King
Daniel X
Gabu
MAS117

Unknown
Sam Spade (Political compass and actions differ)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.