How much of the Hebrew Bible can be taken as fact? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 05:16:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  How much of the Hebrew Bible can be taken as fact? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How much of the Hebrew Bible can be taken as fact?  (Read 13660 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« on: January 25, 2013, 09:01:09 PM »

Depends.  Is there anything in it that we have evidence of outside of the religious texts themselves? 

Yes.  The earliest is the Deir 'Alla inscription which indicates that Balaam, son of Beor, was indeed revered as a prophet among the Moabites as described in the book Numbers.  Altho the inscription has him being a prophet of the gods, not just of YHWH.  Numbers 22 to 24 makes more story sense if in the original tale, Balaam consulted with three gods instead of just one, but it was later revised since there could be no gods except YHWH.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2013, 11:35:19 PM »

I ment Pangea (or the Supercontinint idea in general) explains how all the animals managed to get there.

No it doesn't, because as has already been pointed out to you you're off by some 199.9 million years. Humans didn't even exist at the time of Pangea to build an ark in the first place.

Which are you going to trust, some rocks or the word of Jehovah 1?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.