2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: Missouri (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 05:41:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: Missouri (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: Missouri  (Read 34324 times)
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« on: April 07, 2020, 05:20:06 AM »

Would the remaining Dem district in St. Louis be VRA protected? Because an 8-0 map is not exactly impossible if you can cut that remaining district, although it is not the safest of maps:



Also including 2016-Senate results because why not

MO-01: R+12 (Trump 59-36; Blunt 52-43)
MO-02: R+7 (Trump 56-39; Kander 47.6-47.3)
MO-03: R+6 (Trump 56-39; Kander 48-47.Cool
MO-04: R+10 (Trump 56-38; Kander 48-47)
MO-05: R+7 (Trump 55-40; Blunt 48.1-47.9)
MO-06: R+6 (Trump 55-40; Kander 49-46)
MO-07: R+8 (Trump 57-38; Blunt 50-46)
MO-08: R+13 (Trump 60-35; Blunt 54-42)

So basically you get all 8 Trump districts with him winning by no less than 15 points. In a "perfect storm" like the 2016 Senate race the map does break, with 4 districts voting for Kander, though even there 4 districts end up in essencially statistical ties and are decided by less than 1 point.

Of course with trends and what not I imagine at least one of these districts would break?
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2021, 06:18:27 AM »

My attempt at an R gerrymander of Missouri that keeps Kansas City limits itself whole. Sadly I was unable to make this a proper 7-1 map, instead having to go with 6-1-1. I also tried to keep other COIs relatively intact.



MO-01: Clinton+55, D+27, 50% black
MO-02: Trump+25, R+11
MO-03: Trump+25, R+14
MO-04: Trump+18, R+10
MO-05: Trump+3, EVEN
MO-06: Trump+34, R+16
MO-07: Trump+55, R+23
MO-08: Trump+55, R+26

For the record, in 2016 Kander wins the 5th district by double digits, ekes out a narrow win in the 4th district by 0.4% and loses the 2nd district by 4 points and the third by 9 points
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2021, 02:17:17 PM »

Is that a fair map or some sort of gerrymander?
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2021, 11:56:20 AM »

My thoughts on what a 6-2 Missouri map will probably look like:

snip

Wouldn't Republicans want to at least shore up the 2nd district by more than that? Trump+7 is not exactly a safe district even if it'd be a heavy lift for Dems.
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2021, 12:24:32 PM »

Anyways, here is my attempt at "shoring up the 2nd district" like I mentioned. It's actually harder than it looks. This is a relatively clean map that gives all incumbents their home, although I will admit that it is quite a heavy reconfiguration of most of the map, so they might be angry regardless.

Districts 2 and 3 in this map would be around Trump+19.



https://davesredistricting.org/join/377a39e5-8490-4d1b-885f-56856b9faaa2
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.