Has jfern raised your opinion of Hillary Clinton?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Yes. If your criticism of a candidate are that lame and you even have to resort to right wing talking points like that email crap now, you're kind of proving that they really aren't that bad.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Come on, they are generally criticisms from the left. People claiming that any criticism of Hillary is right-wing has certainly lowered my opinion of Hillary supporters.

Your "criticism from the left" of her rarely rises above just "NEOLIBERAL CORPORATIST WARMONGER!" style ranting that's impossible to take seriously.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Come on, they are generally criticisms from the left. People claiming that any criticism of Hillary is right-wing has certainly lowered my opinion of Hillary supporters.

Your "criticism from the left" of her rarely rises above just "NEOLIBERAL CORPORATIST WARMONGER!" style ranting that's impossible to take seriously.

Oh give me a break, I've listed specific reasons plenty of times for why she's so hawkish, and you can look at her husband's Presidency for no shortage of neoliberalism. The Clintons are DLC to the core; the DLC's records belong to the Clinton Foundation. I don't see you talking much about issues, just freaking nonsense.

Inb4 "b- b- but muh meritocracy"

Don't worry, her male picks will be equally bad.

Also in regards to her hawkishness: http://www.vox.com/2016/4/27/11504272/hillary-clinton-hawk

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

You know that I voted for Sanders right?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

You know that I voted for Sanders right?

And yet you felt compelled to make this thread for some reason.

Because while I voted for Sanders you still have managed to improve my opinion of Hillary Clinton.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Yes I've pointed out how bizarre and illogical Lyndon is multiple times.

The jfern hateboner for Hillary though is the same because:

1-Much of it is just stupid and unjustified ad hominems (see the Cabinet comment I quoted here. Now how is that supposed to convince anyone that she is awful?)
2-Is frequently brought up in threads completely irrelevant to her and
3-Receives far more attention than attacks on any of the Republican candidates.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Looks like Hillary can do what Mondale couldn't; be the first Democrat to lose Minnesota since 1972.

LOL

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Looks like Hillary can do what Mondale couldn't; be the first Democrat to lose Minnesota since 1972.

LOL

CHA-CHING!