Democrat Let's Cat out of Bag on VRA (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 05:29:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Democrat Let's Cat out of Bag on VRA (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democrat Let's Cat out of Bag on VRA  (Read 2041 times)
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« on: December 22, 2011, 03:33:45 PM »

White Democrat in Missouri lays to rest the myth that creating 40% Black districts would still allow Blacks to select "the candidate of their choice:"

http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2011/12/russ-carnahans.php
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2011, 03:46:18 PM »

White Democrat in Missouri lays to rest the myth that creating 40% Black districts would still allow Blacks to select "the candidate of their choice:"

http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2011/12/russ-carnahans.php

Um, wow, that's quite a misreading of this piece.

It is clear that he wrote that the new district will not nominate the Democrat preferred by 85% of Blacks ["the candidate of their choice"] if Russ Carnahan runs.

I have clear recollections of Democrats here writing that even lower Black percentage districts are near certain to nominate and elect Blacks. Pure Bravo Sierra.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2011, 02:40:22 AM »

For the VRA to apply there must be racially polarized voting. A statistically significant difference must exist between a minority population and the white majority. Without that difference the choice of the voters is presumably race neutral. If there is a difference then one should be able to identify in an election the candidate of choice of the minority voters.

If some minority were to vote pretty consistently 50.5% for the Democrat, and, Whites were pretty consistently voting 50.5% for the Republican, that might not be considered "statistically significant," but, its the difference between consistently winning, and, consistenly losing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 10 queries.