Isidewith polls

[RI]

The GOP numbers seem very reasonable, at least for the top candidates. The Dem numbers have always been biased toward Sanders. The GOP numbers were initially biased toward Paul but that seems to have long since washed out.

and where are the GOP numbers???

https://www.isidewith.com/map/A8L4/2016-republican-primary#z5

See also:

Latest iSideWith.com update with Carson in blue and Rubio in green

Update:

Carson in complete collapse on iSideWith:

[RI]

Hmm, am i reading it wrong??  

https://www.isidewith.com/map/A8LR/2016-republican-primary#z5

For the most RECENT votes, Rand Paul took 36 states.

So no.  The site need to be consistent to be taking seriously.

If in the same system, Sanders dominated.  Then how can that system be trusted?

Don't use "fresh", use "new".

[RI]

Don't use "fresh", use "new".

See this is where you fell apart.  Fresh is more current than new.

No it's not. The total voters, especially in smaller states, should tell you that much.

Do you have examples of polls in the database, so I can remove them ?

Those are no scientific polls (to whoever entered them).

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2016R/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=2320151101106

I don't have time to look through all the states.  But something like this, it look pretty legit for Maine and probably align with reality.  But still it from the same website that put Sanders as the front runner.

Thx.

Looks like "realisticidealist" put them into the database.

So, please "realisticidealist": delete them again, because unscientific Internet polls should not be included there.

I've moved them back to the beginning and voided their results.

[RI]

In which states did you enter them, so I can delete them ?

States that are rarely polled: AK, CO, ID, MT, NE, NM, ND, SD, UT, WA