Bush vs. Edwards (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 09:31:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  Bush vs. Edwards (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bush vs. Edwards  (Read 9045 times)
Huckleberry Finn
Finn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,819


« on: November 03, 2004, 07:12:50 AM »

What do you think? How John Edwards would have succeeded against Bush? I consider that he would have done a little better especially among working class and women, probably would have picked up Ohio, Iowa and New Mexico.

About women and Bush. My mom vote mostly greens (but is centrist moderate in our standarts) here in Finland, but it seems that she is very delighted about Bush as person.
Logged
Huckleberry Finn
Finn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,819


« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2004, 08:52:34 AM »

What do you think? How John Edwards would have succeeded against Bush? I consider that he would have done a little better especially among working class and women, probably would have picked up Ohio, Iowa and New Mexico.

About women and Bush. My mom vote mostly greens (but is centrist moderate in our standarts) here in Finland, but it seems that she is very delighted about Bush as person.
We nominated the wrong man...
Hey you're from Belgium not from the USA! I think you affiliate yourself as American democrat a little too stronly.
Logged
Huckleberry Finn
Finn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,819


« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2004, 12:11:26 PM »

Clark seemed to have skeletons in his closet.  I supported him during the primaries, but I think he would have had a scandal or two in the general election which would have killed him.

Yeah, he had little things that would have hurt him.  Like the time he ordered the British to start WWIII.  That might have hurt him a bit.

World War III.  Say what?!?

During the Serbian operation, Russian troops occupied the Pristina Airport.  Clark, without orders, ordered the Britsh forces to take it from them, by force. 

The UK Commander Gen. Michael Jackson (that name is an odd coincidence), refused, on the grounds that the government had to order an attack on non-combant foreign troops.  Clark, enraged called Jackson's superiors in London.  They backed up Jackson.  Then Clark called the Pentagon, who also supported Jackson.  Soon after, Clark "retired."

While prehaps not starting WWIII, the action does reflect on Clark's judgment.
See. Clark is not dovish. He would have been the right man to lead war on terror. Action now questions later!

About Lieberman. He would have got most Jewish votes, yes. But he is too moderate for far-left liberals. Nader would have got much more votes if Lieberman had been a candidate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.