SC - Clemson: Clinton +50 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 11, 2024, 05:19:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  SC - Clemson: Clinton +50 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SC - Clemson: Clinton +50  (Read 8289 times)
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,760
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« on: February 25, 2016, 12:47:25 PM »

http://newsstand.clemson.edu/mediarelations/clinton-will-win-by-wide-margin-in-south-carolina-palmetto-poll-shows/

Clinton 64
Sanders 14

Feb 20 - 25, 650 polled, MoE +/- 3%.

It's a university poll. But consistent with Clinton being up 30-40% in other Southern states like Georgia and Texas. So.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,760
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2016, 01:15:03 PM »

I wonder why University polls underestimate the losing candidate most of the time? Clinton is for sure probably at 64%, but Sanders at 14% is just such an embarrassing thing to publish.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,760
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2016, 02:44:40 PM »

I wonder why University polls underestimate the losing candidate most of the time? Clinton is for sure probably at 64%, but Sanders at 14% is just such an embarrassing thing to publish.

Well this is a trash poll but since it overestimates Clinton you couldn't help but to publish it.

I didn't publish this poll.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,760
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2016, 01:51:51 AM »

Notice:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So the result isn't ridiculous. But, as it's not meant to include all likely voters, I'm not sure why the aggregators are even including this one.

So this poll excludes anyone under 22 years old? The youth are like 80%+ Sanders voters...

They're excluded if they're indicated that they don't plan to vote in the primary. Otherwise they're included.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,760
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2016, 11:40:20 AM »

Notice:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So the result isn't ridiculous. But, as it's not meant to include all likely voters, I'm not sure why the aggregators are even including this one.

So this poll excludes anyone under 22 years old? The youth are like 80%+ Sanders voters...

They're excluded if they're indicated that they don't plan to vote in the primary. Otherwise they're included.

The exvlusion wuoted above sers forth two parameters--intention to vote AND voting history. Young voters by virtue of a ge have no voting history.

I read it as the poll includes 1) people who say they're likely to vote in this election and 2) have voted in the last two out of three statewide primaries. But yeah, the wording is pretty vague and it won't matter in 7 hours anyway.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,760
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2016, 08:06:16 PM »

Heh.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,760
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2016, 10:56:23 PM »

To be fair, no polling caught this except for this one. You can make an argument that the 40% or 50% margins in the recent Georgia and Texas polls could have been foreshadowing this, but still.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.