Polling Projections based on more than one poll (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 10:26:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  Polling Projections based on more than one poll (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Polling Projections based on more than one poll  (Read 381 times)
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

« on: December 22, 2007, 11:36:08 AM »

I've created this thread for those who like to create projections based on more than one poll (i.e. people who use weighted moving average, rolling averages or polls-of-polls).

I'm going to kick the discussion of with my projections based on Samplemiser

1. Hillary 2. Obama 3. Edwards 4. Biden 5. Richardson (raw polls)
1. Hillary. 2. Edwards 3. Obama 4. Biden 5. Richardson (raw polls adj for caucus rules).

http://thepoliticaltipster.wordpress.com/2007/12/22/why-hillary-should-be-smiling-for-now/

First, forget early national polls on the nomination.

Second, its extremely difficult/expensive to accurately survey for caucuses.

Third, all polls are not created equal.  For example, Mason-Dixon is far better than ARG.

Fourth, polls are often mere "snapshots" which can change in a short time span.

So, in conclusion, while looking at several polls is useful, to equally weight ARG and Mason-Dixon (to use one example) is to skew the results.  Its like adding dirty water (ARG) to clean water (Mason-Dixon).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.