Were the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally justified? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 10:16:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Were the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally justified? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Were the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally justified?  (Read 3994 times)
Leinad
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -7.91
« on: August 04, 2015, 10:04:27 AM »
No, they weren't. The killing of innocent people is never justified.
Logged
Leinad
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -7.91
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2015, 09:42:10 PM »
Quote from: HagridOfTheDeep on August 04, 2015, 11:21:31 AM
But you've got to have that death and destruction first for the world to know that these are weapons that should never be used. A mushroom cloud on an island would not suffice.

What about a military base? Or some kind of government building? Maybe I'm fringe-y on this issue because I don't think killing of innocent civilians who never explicitly consented to the war is ever morally justified, but I still think there was a better way.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.