Were the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally justified? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 08:23:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Were the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally justified? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Were the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally justified?  (Read 3995 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« on: August 04, 2015, 10:09:12 PM »

No, they weren't. The killing of innocent people is never justified.

Yes, this. Although under this logic war would never be justified, there's something about dropping a bomb on innocent civilians that irks me. During wartime, there's always going to be deaths of innocent civilians, but people don't go into war with the intent to harm civilian populations (unless its total war). The difference between dropping a bomb and going in with an invasion is that dropping the bomb is knowingly going to kill civilians, and to me that's the deep end of immoral.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 10 queries.