McInnes assaulted at NYU. Pepperspayed. Professor advocated violence. 11 arrests
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 08:18:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  McInnes assaulted at NYU. Pepperspayed. Professor advocated violence. 11 arrests
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Author Topic: McInnes assaulted at NYU. Pepperspayed. Professor advocated violence. 11 arrests  (Read 4709 times)
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,234
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: February 04, 2017, 02:15:14 PM »


Okay, I stand corrected.  But in the year 2017 it is clearly the left that is doing more political violence.  Right-wingers don't smash windows and assault people when a left-wing speaker comes on campus and then justify it as "fighting Communism."

People don't tend to be violent when they control the Presidency, Congress, Supreme Court, and to a lesser extent the military and the police. Did you hear of any big Black Panther marches under Obama (even though he wasn't sympathetic to their cause)? Has there been a May 1968 style socialist uprising under Hollande? Do we see massive pro-Putin riots in Russia? No, because it wouldn't make sense to cause destruction when your guy is in charge. And let me reiterate, the people causing violence at these things are largely apolitical anarchists. It's not people who caucused for Hillary or Sanders (okay, maybe a couple) but the vast majority are just anti-establishment extremists who will justify it by associating themselves with whatever movement is en vogue at the moment.

I understand that the violent rioters are a fringe minority.  I hope I didn't come off as thinking that the average Democrat is like this.

But we just didn't see similar right-wing violence in the last 8 years.  When Sanders went to speak at Liberty University, students (or outside agitators) didn't smash windows and then justify it by comparing Sanders to Stalin.

I'm trying to be fair to both sides.  My own party has done things that disgust me and I am very critical of the current administration.
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,234
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: February 04, 2017, 02:35:49 PM »


Okay, I stand corrected.  But in the year 2017 it is clearly the left that is doing more political violence.  Right-wingers don't smash windows and assault people when a left-wing speaker comes on campus and then justify it as "fighting Communism."

People don't tend to be violent when they control the Presidency, Congress, Supreme Court, and to a lesser extent the military and the police. Did you hear of any big Black Panther marches under Obama (even though he wasn't sympathetic to their cause)? Has there been a May 1968 style socialist uprising under Hollande? Do we see massive pro-Putin riots in Russia? No, because it wouldn't make sense to cause destruction when your guy is in charge. And let me reiterate, the people causing violence at these things are largely apolitical anarchists. It's not people who caucused for Hillary or Sanders (okay, maybe a couple) but the vast majority are just anti-establishment extremists who will justify it by associating themselves with whatever movement is en vogue at the moment.

I understand that the violent rioters are a fringe minority.  I hope I didn't come off as thinking that the average Democrat is like this.

But we just didn't see similar right-wing violence in the last 8 years.  When Sanders went to speak at Liberty University, students (or outside agitators) didn't smash windows and then justify it by comparing Sanders to Stalin.

I'm trying to be fair to both sides.  My own party has done things that disgust me and I am very critical of the current administration.

Bruh...Hillary used to have to wear bulletproof vests as first lady:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It's a sad fact of life, but if you are the President or the first lady or the Vice President, or a member of the cabinet, there are going to be people who want to kill you.  This has been the case for a long time and it will continue to be the case a long time from now.
Logged
Jeffster
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 483
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: February 04, 2017, 02:44:21 PM »


BWAHAHAHA!!! Have you actually watched the video of that incident? Not the selective photos of the event, but the actual video. Those antifa morons were blocking people from going to work. When one guy had enough and pushed his way through they started hitting him. He hit back. Then the leader of their little pack started screaming "he hit a woman, you do not hit women!" I thought those antifa morons were into the whole "smash the patriarchy, women are equal to men." Well the woman swung at the man first, and he hit back. Then she spits at him and her slaps her face away. So she assaulted him twice and he responded each time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXKgc2fux3w
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,234
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: February 04, 2017, 02:52:49 PM »


Okay, I stand corrected.  But in the year 2017 it is clearly the left that is doing more political violence.  Right-wingers don't smash windows and assault people when a left-wing speaker comes on campus and then justify it as "fighting Communism."

People don't tend to be violent when they control the Presidency, Congress, Supreme Court, and to a lesser extent the military and the police. Did you hear of any big Black Panther marches under Obama (even though he wasn't sympathetic to their cause)? Has there been a May 1968 style socialist uprising under Hollande? Do we see massive pro-Putin riots in Russia? No, because it wouldn't make sense to cause destruction when your guy is in charge. And let me reiterate, the people causing violence at these things are largely apolitical anarchists. It's not people who caucused for Hillary or Sanders (okay, maybe a couple) but the vast majority are just anti-establishment extremists who will justify it by associating themselves with whatever movement is en vogue at the moment.

I understand that the violent rioters are a fringe minority.  I hope I didn't come off as thinking that the average Democrat is like this.

But we just didn't see similar right-wing violence in the last 8 years.  When Sanders went to speak at Liberty University, students (or outside agitators) didn't smash windows and then justify it by comparing Sanders to Stalin.

I'm trying to be fair to both sides.  My own party has done things that disgust me and I am very critical of the current administration.

Bruh...Hillary used to have to wear bulletproof vests as first lady:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It's a sad fact of life, but if you are the President or the first lady or the Vice President, or a member of the cabinet, there are going to be people who want to kill you.  This has been the case for a long time and it will continue to be the case a long time from now.

It seems weird that right-wingers wanted to shoot Hillary for trying to get universal health care of all things

It would be like lefties trying to shoot Trump for trying to cut taxes

No one actually shot her.
Logged
Horus
Sheliak5
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,929
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: February 04, 2017, 04:13:37 PM »

This guy seems like your standard 2017 right winger. Spencer I get, even Milo I can understand, but why McInnes?
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,234
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: February 04, 2017, 04:42:30 PM »

This guy seems like your standard 2017 right winger. Spencer I get, even Milo I can understand, but why McInnes?

Because Antifa views everything as Fascist.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,214
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: February 05, 2017, 12:20:31 AM »

This guy seems like your standard 2017 right winger. Spencer I get, even Milo I can understand, but why McInnes?

Because Antifa views everything as Fascist.

     Part of the danger of justifying violence is that ultimately everyone is justified as a target for violence. You don't have to be a Nazi for the Antifa to call you one.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: February 05, 2017, 12:22:04 AM »

This guy seems like your standard 2017 right winger. Spencer I get, even Milo I can understand, but why McInnes?

check the dudes views on women. Though I suppose the right has gone nuts in the last two years so maybe that is what standard right-winger in 2017 believes, I have no clue.
Logged
EnglishPete
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,605


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: February 05, 2017, 11:59:53 AM »

Steve Sailor has a great translation of Trigglyprof's epic meltdown rant. Here is the original


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

and here is the translation


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
http://www.unz.com/isteve/
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.222 seconds with 12 queries.