Redistricting victims next cycle. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 11:29:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Redistricting victims next cycle. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Redistricting victims next cycle.  (Read 10691 times)
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,679
United States


« on: October 17, 2018, 02:13:24 PM »

How do you chop up MN-1?   there's going to be a southeast district in any map that's drawn.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,679
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2018, 08:04:06 PM »

Alabama - AL-7 is most underpopulated but also VRA so it'll obviously survive in some form. AL-6 is probably the district that gets cut up, in fact I think it's the only real choice.

Illinois - IL-16 will probably get divided up between Chicagoland and the rest of the state.  IL-14 will take it's place as the border district.

Michigan - Probably lose a Detroit district (MI-13?).  On the plus side MI-12 will probably get pushed out of Wayne so Washtenaw can finally have it's own district (with some surrounding counties obviously).

Minnesota - MN-7 gets chopped.  Have one big gigantic "Northern Minnesota" district, and then divide the rest between MN-1 and MN-6.

New York - NY-22 is the most centrally located and the most underpopulated. Since Upstate NY is the big loser with NY redistricting it's the prime target.

Ohio - BLEH!  Redo the whole map, what a mess.

Pennsylvania - Tough one.   I'd guess the best option is PA-12.   The northeast is the most underpopulated, so expand PA-8 and PA-9 into PA-12 to accommodate the eastern part of the state, give PA-15 the rest to accommodate the rest of the state.  

West Virginia - WV-2.  Duh.

Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,679
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2018, 11:27:19 AM »

4 bases in Alabama have to have their own districts:

  • African-American (7)
  • Mobile (1)
  • Huntsville/northern tier (5)
  • Birmingham suburbs (6)

This all points to the 3rd district being dismembered or moving so far north it's effectively a different district.

But the 3rd is on the eastern boarder.   It makes more sense to just expand it into AL-6 and move it north so AL-7 can get more AA voters.   Then cut off that northern part of AL-6 and give it to the two northern district.   

Removing AL-3 altogether would require basically an entirely new map.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,679
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2018, 03:08:06 PM »

Yeah, Cooper's a goner.   Whatevs, we can make that seat up elsewhere.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,679
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2018, 07:25:14 PM »

I don't think splitting Davidson four ways is needed.   Just cutting it in half would be fine.   At the very most it should only be 3 districts in Davidson and even that is pushing it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 10 queries.