WA: Rasmussen: Incumbent Cantwell (D) lead narrows against McGavick (R) in Washington (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 05:12:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  WA: Rasmussen: Incumbent Cantwell (D) lead narrows against McGavick (R) in Washington (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WA: Rasmussen: Incumbent Cantwell (D) lead narrows against McGavick (R) in Washington  (Read 1607 times)
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW
« on: September 23, 2006, 08:59:52 PM »

McGavick is a lamb that has been sacrificed to fill ballot space against a very popular Democratic incumbent in a Democratic state. Most of the narrowing polls are just pre-election anti-incumbent agnst that a lot of popular incumbents endure. In the end, the Democratic base will put Cantwell way over the top against her very lousy opponent. Predicition:

Maria Cantwell: 53.6%
Mike McGavick: 44.1%
Aaron Dixon: 2.3%
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2006, 11:10:52 PM »

But Perry and Lieberman are going down, right?

Both are possible.
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2006, 12:51:07 PM »


It's ridiculous to say that an incumbent you like will GAIN votes because she's an incumbent, but at the same time claim that incumbents you dislike will LOSE votes for no particular reason. Perry for instance is way ahead of Cantwell. Lieberman probably is too.

Cantwell is far more popular than Perry and is only dealing with one serious challeneger while Perry is dealing with three (two of which attract conservative attention). Besides, there are many reasons why Perry can and will lose votes...If you have heard of the Trans-Texas Corridor, you will know what I mean.

Lieberman on the other hand has become an imbecile...but I doubt he'll lose. Lamont just isnt a strong enough campaigner as lastest polls have proven. I really have no clue about this race, it's an odd one.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.