$1.5 Trillion GOP Tax Cut Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 06:35:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  $1.5 Trillion GOP Tax Cut Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79
Author Topic: $1.5 Trillion GOP Tax Cut Thread  (Read 113328 times)
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1875 on: December 05, 2017, 05:05:58 PM »

Collins did say she wasn't a yes on the final bill. Collins + Corker + Huh = Failed bill.

= House passing the Senate bill

I'd argue that the freedom caucus could derail that notion.

Actually, it's the gaffe on corporate AMT that Wulfric mentioned a few days ago. That's what makes that mistake so significant: The House WILL NOT pass the Senate bill.

You may be right, but since the House was willing to pass skinny repeal, I think they'd be more afraid of doing nothing than of passing the Senate bill which accidentally repeals the R&D credit. I don't think there are any bright red lines there.

That's definitely a possibility. However, I'm not sure they'll be willing to pass a bill, that, for instance, raises Murray Energy's taxes by several billions of dollars.
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1876 on: December 05, 2017, 06:44:40 PM »

The Trump convention also includes insults. Edited a few.

You know what, screw it, if we're doing that, we don't even need to specify states.

"Creepy Al"
"Amy"
"Angus"
"Swampy Ben"
"Cuck Ben"
"Crazy Bernie"
"Bob"
"Lightweight Bob"
"Cartel Bob"
"Healthcare Bill"
"Astro Boy Bill"
"Brian"
"Crooked Catherine"
"Baldy Chris"
"Baby Chris"
"German Chris"
"Chuck Weed"
"Cuck Chuck"
"Claire"
"Corporate Cory"
"Good Cory"
"Dan"
"David"
"Rural Deb"
"Urban Debbie"
"Dean"
"Dianne"
"Dick, the other Chuck"
"Ed"
"Gary"
"Heidi the Good Woman"
"Crooked Jack"
"Awkward James"
"Jeanne"
"Flakey Jeff"
"Crazy Jeff"
"Jerry"
"Gay-Killer Jim"
"Cowboy Jim"
"Fat Joe"
"Thin Joe"
"Four-eyes Johnny"
"Ratface John"
"John Booze"
"John, the other Mitch"
"Mario John"
"Frog John"
"Traitor John"
"Skinny John"
"Fat Jon"
"Joni"
"Kamala"
"Crooked Kirsten"
"Lamar"
"RINO Lindsey"
"Lisa"
"Pocahontas Liz"
"Big Luther"
"Little Marco"
"Maggie"
"Mark"
"Martin"
"Mazie"
"Bad Michael"
"Mike Crap"
"Senile Mike"
"Forehead Mike"
"StateFarm Mike"
"Mitch"
"Orrin"
"Bald Pat"
"The other Bald Pat"
"Pat who won because of me"
"Psycho Patty"
"Rand"
"Richard"
"Richard who's pretending to investigate me"
"Hick Richard"
"Gay Rob"
"Roger"
"Money Ron"
"Won who talkth with a lithp"
"Roy"
"Sheldon not in the White House"
"Coal Shelley"
"Sherrod"
"Steve"
"Susan"
"Gay Tammy"
"China Tammy"
"Lyin' Ted"
"Thad"
"Tom who spelled his name wrong"
"Corrupt Kaine"
"Black Tim"
"Todd"
"Tom who needs a dentist"
"Tom the Deporter"
"Pinkface Tom"
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,272
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1877 on: December 05, 2017, 07:30:17 PM »

The Trump convention also includes insults. Edited a few.

You know what, screw it, if we're doing that, we don't even need to specify states.

"Creepy Al"
"Amy"
"Angus"
"Swampy Ben"
"Cuck Ben"
"Crazy Bernie"
"Bob"
"Lightweight Bob"
"Cartel Bob"
"Healthcare Bill"
"Astro Boy Bill"
"Brian"
"Crooked Catherine"
"Baldy Chris"
"Baby Chris"
"German Chris"
"Chuck Weed"
"Cuck Chuck"
"Claire"
"Corporate Cory"
"Good Cory"
"Dan"
"David"
"Rural Deb"
"Urban Debbie"
"Dean"
"Dianne"
"Dick, the other Chuck"
"Ed"
"Gary"
"Heidi the Good Woman"
"Crooked Jack"
"Awkward James"
"Jeanne"
"Flakey Jeff"
"Crazy Jeff"
"Jerry"
"Gay-Killer Jim"
"Cowboy Jim"
"Fat Joe"
"Thin Joe"
"Four-eyes Johnny"
"Ratface John"
"John Booze"
"John, the other Mitch"
"Mario John"
"Frog John"
"Traitor John"
"Skinny John"
"Fat Jon"
"Joni"
"Kamala"
"Crooked Kirsten"
"Lamar"
"RINO Lindsey"
"Lisa"
"Pocahontas Liz"
"Big Luther"
"Little Marco"
"Maggie"
"Mark"
"Martin"
"Mazie"
"Bad Michael"
"Mike Crap"
"Senile Mike"
"Forehead Mike"
"StateFarm Mike"
"Mitch"
"Orrin"
"Bald Pat"
"The other Bald Pat"
"Pat who won because of me"
"Psycho Patty"
"Rand"
"Richard"
"Richard who's pretending to investigate me"
"Hick Richard"
"Gay Rob"
"Roger"
"Money Ron"
"Won who talkth with a lithp"
"Roy"
"Sheldon not in the White House"
"Coal Shelley"
"Sherrod"
"Steve"
"Susan"
"Gay Tammy"
"China Tammy"
"Lyin' Ted"
"Thad"
"Tom who spelled his name wrong"
"Corrupt Kaine"
"Black Tim"
"Todd"
"Tom who needs a dentist"
"Tom the Deporter"
"Pinkface Tom"

...this is amazing.
Logged
junior chįmp
Mondale_was_an_insidejob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,394
Croatia
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1878 on: December 05, 2017, 07:58:27 PM »

Trump about to cause a recession fam

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1879 on: December 05, 2017, 11:16:42 PM »

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/04/business/economy/tax-bill-new-york.html

"Even if most rich New Yorkers stay put, local politicians could find it harder to raise taxes to pay for services. Mr. de Blasio, for example, has called for a tax on millionaires to help fix the city’s subway system. Mr. Murphy, the New Jersey governor-elect, wants a similar tax for public schools.

Without the state and local tax deduction, those plans could face more opposition. Already, top Democratic lawmakers in New Jersey have hinted they might back away from supporting Mr. Murphy’s millionaire tax if the deduction is repealed."

This plan to get rid of SALT deductions is having the affect I was hoping for.

New Jersey spends something approaching $20k per kid in order to enrich the parasitic overpaid teachers unions. Now they are going to get it.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1880 on: December 06, 2017, 07:42:59 AM »

'Holy crap': Experts find tax plan riddled with glitches

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/06/tax-plan-glitches-mistakes-republicans-208049

Completely predictable. Anyone who works in technology could have predicted this.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1881 on: December 06, 2017, 10:45:34 AM »

The AMT goof may be nearly $300bn.

https://slate.com/business/2017/12/senate-republicans-may-have-made-a-usd260-billion-mistake-in-their-tax-bill.html
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,684
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1882 on: December 06, 2017, 11:22:04 AM »

Current GOP discussions on SALT deductions are a compromise where instead of a cap of 10K  on real estate taxes it would be a 10K cap on all SALT deductions and the taxpayer can pick between state and local income taxes OR real estate taxes.  Does not seem to me that this will make much of a difference for married taxpayers.  I guess it would for single taxpayers in some cases.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1883 on: December 06, 2017, 11:40:01 AM »

Current GOP discussions on SALT deductions are a compromise where instead of a cap of 10K  on real estate taxes it would be a 10K cap on all SALT deductions and the taxpayer can pick between state and local income taxes OR real estate taxes.  Does not seem to me that this will make much of a difference for married taxpayers.  I guess it would for single taxpayers in some cases.

My partner and I pay less than $5000 in “personal" property taxes, partly because half our property taxes are a business expense, but more than $10,000 in state income tax.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,684
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1884 on: December 06, 2017, 12:15:20 PM »

Current GOP discussions on SALT deductions are a compromise where instead of a cap of 10K  on real estate taxes it would be a 10K cap on all SALT deductions and the taxpayer can pick between state and local income taxes OR real estate taxes.  Does not seem to me that this will make much of a difference for married taxpayers.  I guess it would for single taxpayers in some cases.

My partner and I pay less than $5000 in “personal" property taxes, partly because half our property taxes are a business expense, but more than $10,000 in state income tax.

So under this "compromise" GOP idea you and your partner can now deduct 10K instead of 5K.  Of course under current law the deduction would be 5K plus (10K+).  Assuming you are filing jointly and do not have other large deductions (like charity or mortgage) this does not matter that much because 10K vs 5K is still way less than 24K in standard deduction.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,921


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1885 on: December 06, 2017, 12:23:51 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
junior chįmp
Mondale_was_an_insidejob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,394
Croatia
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1886 on: December 06, 2017, 12:28:36 PM »


This is the guy who literally coined the term "Obama's war on coal"
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1887 on: December 06, 2017, 01:23:58 PM »

Current GOP discussions on SALT deductions are a compromise where instead of a cap of 10K  on real estate taxes it would be a 10K cap on all SALT deductions and the taxpayer can pick between state and local income taxes OR real estate taxes.  Does not seem to me that this will make much of a difference for married taxpayers.  I guess it would for single taxpayers in some cases.

YESYESYESYESYESYESYES.

GOOD.
Logged
Tintrlvr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,331


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1888 on: December 06, 2017, 01:49:42 PM »

Current GOP discussions on SALT deductions are a compromise where instead of a cap of 10K  on real estate taxes it would be a 10K cap on all SALT deductions and the taxpayer can pick between state and local income taxes OR real estate taxes.  Does not seem to me that this will make much of a difference for married taxpayers.  I guess it would for single taxpayers in some cases.

This is more of a giveaway to the rich than restoring SALT entirely since it only affects people who wouldn't otherwise take the standard deduction if SALT were entirely abolished - people with big mortgages or large charitable donations (or both).
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1889 on: December 06, 2017, 01:54:57 PM »

When's the Senate voting on going to conference?

Also, is it possible that a couple of Republicans can join with the Democrats to force someone like Collins into the conference committee?
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,684
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1890 on: December 06, 2017, 01:58:46 PM »

Current GOP discussions on SALT deductions are a compromise where instead of a cap of 10K  on real estate taxes it would be a 10K cap on all SALT deductions and the taxpayer can pick between state and local income taxes OR real estate taxes.  Does not seem to me that this will make much of a difference for married taxpayers.  I guess it would for single taxpayers in some cases.

This is more of a giveaway to the rich than restoring SALT entirely since it only affects people who wouldn't otherwise take the standard deduction if SALT were entirely abolished - people with big mortgages or large charitable donations (or both).

Sure.  But the people that usually itemize are higher income taxpayers (in high tax states) anyway.  So the tax plan came in to hurt them and when there is a compromise, sure, it then "unhurts" them a bit.
Logged
BudgieForce
superbudgie1582
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,298


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1891 on: December 06, 2017, 02:36:11 PM »

The removal of Salt deductions would screw over alot of upper middle class families in high tax states. Im glad some progress is being made to lessen the blow.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,684
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1892 on: December 06, 2017, 03:27:00 PM »

The removal of Salt deductions would screw over alot of upper middle class families in high tax states. Im glad some progress is being made to lessen the blow.

But if that were your concern then I assume you would have opposed the Obamacare tax increase on income over 200K/250K. Because it is the same set of people. 
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1893 on: December 06, 2017, 03:39:12 PM »

The Senate has just voted to go to conference, 51-47.
Logged
BudgieForce
superbudgie1582
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,298


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1894 on: December 06, 2017, 03:46:50 PM »

The removal of Salt deductions would screw over alot of upper middle class families in high tax states. Im glad some progress is being made to lessen the blow.

But if that were your concern then I assume you would have opposed the Obamacare tax increase on income over 200K/250K. Because it is the same set of people. 

The Obamacare taxes helped poor people afford insurance. The purpose of removing SALT is to offset tax cuts for the wealthy. Its not comparable.
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1895 on: December 06, 2017, 03:47:00 PM »

The Senate has just voted to go to conference, 51-47.

Who are the members?

Can Dems + Collins + Corker + someone else force them to put Collins on the conference?
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1896 on: December 06, 2017, 03:51:20 PM »

Also,

1. What's in the Angus motion?

2. How are they voting on it?
Logged
Tintrlvr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,331


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1897 on: December 06, 2017, 03:59:32 PM »
« Edited: December 06, 2017, 04:01:07 PM by Tintrlvr »

Current GOP discussions on SALT deductions are a compromise where instead of a cap of 10K  on real estate taxes it would be a 10K cap on all SALT deductions and the taxpayer can pick between state and local income taxes OR real estate taxes.  Does not seem to me that this will make much of a difference for married taxpayers.  I guess it would for single taxpayers in some cases.

This is more of a giveaway to the rich than restoring SALT entirely since it only affects people who wouldn't otherwise take the standard deduction if SALT were entirely abolished - people with big mortgages or large charitable donations (or both).

Sure.  But the people that usually itemize are higher income taxpayers (in high tax states) anyway.  So the tax plan came in to hurt them and when there is a compromise, sure, it then "unhurts" them a bit.

Well, yes and no. People in NYC, for example, right now always itemize down to about 75k in income just on the basis of SALT. This does nothing for the people in the lower end of that group but is helpful for people around 300k or so (it also favors older people over younger ones since it's really all about whether you have a mortgage or not, but that's more of a feature of the mortgage deduction that has knock-on consequences here).
Logged
BudgieForce
superbudgie1582
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,298


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1898 on: December 06, 2017, 04:02:14 PM »

Hello Speaker Nancy Pelosi....

https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/938511418722258944

Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1899 on: December 06, 2017, 04:04:06 PM »

Angus' motion to instruct on keeping the bill deficit-neutral fails, 48-50.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 8 queries.