Why do Republicans have more leeway to attack Democratic states/cities than vise-versa? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 12:45:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why do Republicans have more leeway to attack Democratic states/cities than vise-versa? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why do Republicans have more leeway to attack Democratic states/cities than vise-versa?  (Read 1348 times)
Kamala's side hoe
khuzifenq
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,383
United States


P P
WWW
« on: June 25, 2023, 11:48:15 PM »

Because (as migration data shows) lots of people who live in Blue America would like to live in Red America, while the reverse is a much more marginal phenomenon. (Note that, OTOH, more rural people would like to move to an urban area than vice versa. How can both of these things be true? Why, the power of magical thinking.) Thus, when Republicans attack someplace governed by Democrats, many of the people there tend to agree, while the reverse is much less true.

This is easier to wrap your head around when you realize that rural -> urban migration generally occurs within states, not between them. But urban -> suburban or suburban -> exurban migration within a metro area frequently crosses state lines.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 10 queries.