Attn. Justices: Atlasia v. Benconstine (Case Closed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 02:02:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Attn. Justices: Atlasia v. Benconstine (Case Closed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Attn. Justices: Atlasia v. Benconstine (Case Closed)  (Read 2115 times)
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

« on: April 16, 2009, 11:40:39 PM »
« edited: April 17, 2009, 08:02:28 PM by AG Marokai Blue »

I would like to bring to the court's attention the case of Atlasia v.s Benconstine. Ben has been charged with violating the Voting Whilst Banned Act (and by doing so, violating a court ordered punishment of a 13 week voting ban).

The details can be viewed here: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=94114.msg1970390#msg1970390

I hope we can get off the ground fairly quickly.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2009, 11:49:31 PM »

For the record, it seems all traces of this law's debate and passage have been deleted.

It remains, but for some reason the link from the Wiki is broken. I thought it was deleted earlier myself.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2009, 06:03:10 PM »

I do ask the court for a light sentence, as this was near the end of his punishment and no serious electoral implications are on the horizon.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2009, 06:51:48 PM »

I do ask the court for a light sentence, as this was near the end of his punishment and no serious electoral implications are on the horizon.

First, It is the court's understanding that the defendant's previous sentence was to expire soon, for the record, when was it set to end?  And assuming the defendant had not violated the law, would he have been eligible to vote in this election?

Ben was sentenced to a 91 day voting ban, he voted roughly 4 or 5 days before his sentence was up, depending on when you interpret the punishment beginning on the 19th of Jan. It's possible Ben would have been eligible to vote on the last day of voting, but I'm unsure.

However, The Voting Whilst Banned Act states voting or even the attempt to vote is illegal while banned from doing so. Ben was under a voting ban at the time of the vote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

A reasonable extension of his existing voting ban. A two or three week extension is fair I think, in light of the near end of his sentence, I simply seek a light sentence, I'll leave the details to the court.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2009, 08:05:20 PM »

I thank the court for the swift action with which this case was dealt with. Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 10 queries.