How would presidential campaigns change if there was a national popular vote? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 03:38:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  How would presidential campaigns change if there was a national popular vote? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How would presidential campaigns change if there was a national popular vote?  (Read 3580 times)
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
« on: April 01, 2015, 04:01:57 PM »

I actually think the GOP would get a slightly higher percentage of the black and hispanic vote. They would be forced to campaign in cities and places where the GOP message is never heard.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2015, 04:02:46 PM »

Campaigns would be even MORE expensive and subject to more outside influence.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2015, 10:29:59 AM »

I actually think the GOP would get a slightly higher percentage of the black and hispanic vote. They would be forced to campaign in cities and places where the GOP message is never heard.

I'm not sure about that.  I think it quickly turns into an urban vs. rural/outer suburbs turnout battle and both parties get more extreme.  California and Texas would quickly be driven into Vermont and Oklahoma territory.

I can see that too.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2015, 12:11:33 AM »

Campaigns would cost more and there would be more PAC money
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.