As I said before, allowing candidates to attack other candidates' family (or even the bond of the family), is an area we should not allow our politics to succumb to. This is such a disgusting, bottom-of-the-barrel attack on someone, it is beyond my comprehension to understand. Leave it to her to take US politics to such a new repugnant low.
I think Fiorina is such an imbecile and a creep, that I for one, am glad her prospects for anything in government is down the tubes. Good riddance.
How is this any different from people who bring up Trump's divorces? Why are Mrs. Clinton's views on marriage, particularly her own marriage, off limits? And how is raising the subject "sexist"? I mean, if the wife of one of the gentlemen running for president was known to have had an affair, do you think folks wouldn't ask him about it? And if they did, would it somehow be sexist, or is this another case of double standard?
You ask "how is this any different
from people who bring up Trump's divorces ?"
Well it's "different" because those who may want to talk about "Trump's divorces" are not other candidates. Yes, you are going to have some idiots who bring-up and discuss other people's marriages, but other candidates for The Office have not dived into this forbidden territory.
Just because you have crazy radio personalities (or the like) who want to discuss things like this, does not yield and allow candidates to go there. Your sneaky wording of using "from people" does not include other candidates who have attacked family of other candidates.
I am not aware of Sanders or Hillary attacking other candidates' family or their bond/marriage.
Again, "silly," your entire logic is rubbish.
