Why does everyone assume we are talking about polygyny and not polyandry?
Because they are normal.
No, they are not.
From your link...
Neither does Polygamy or Polygyny.
I have live and spent time in multiple countries where polygamy is widespread. What I am posting in this thread is not theory, my friend.
No doubt. But it does not exist in most of the world either. More of the world, sure, but not most. But the existence of Polyandry is not zero (May need a sub for those two articles).
Here is an incomplete map of the polygamy world...
Anyone who puts that conservative estimate in the same sentence as polyandry is kidding themselves. If we all lived in Tibet we would be having a different conversation. Fortunately we don't.
Swaziland and South Africa should be Green, no? At least they both have polygamous leaders.
Anyways, I'm against Polygamy. I can get behind Triumvirate type marriages, but Polygamy is an inherently misogynistic institution. There's nothing "equal" about polygamy. In a triumvirate marriage, the relationship would at least in theory not be misogynistic. In that type of marriage, all three people would be married to each other.
