INDOHRPAD
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 17, 2024, 11:17:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  INDOHRPAD
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: INDOHRPAD  (Read 1577 times)
Anzeigenhauptmeister
Hades
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,375
Israel


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 24, 2017, 10:49:59 AM »
« edited: August 24, 2017, 02:02:21 PM by Ἅιδης »

Describe a scenario and make a map where Indiana and Pennsylvania vote Democrat while Ohio votes Republican.

Logged
PoliticalShelter
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 407
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2017, 10:58:53 AM »

Well in the 2008 election Obama mangaged to win Indiana and only won Ohio by 5 points, so maybe have the 2008 election be between Obama and Rob Portman or some relatively popular Ohioan republican.
Make sure that he is not too popular to seriously change the overall 2008 result, just enough to have a good home state performance, to keep Ohio republican.
Logged
Blackacre
Spenstar3D
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -7.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2017, 11:02:58 AM »



Basically, the Midwest splits. Michigan flips back because it was super close, so does PA, but WI and OH stay Republican. Arizona and Georgia flipping as well as Florida, NC, and NE-02 indicates a significant win for the Democratic candidate, which means an unpopular President Trump in 2020. Indiana votes Dem because of its anti-incumbent streak, which Ohio, Iowa, and Wisconsin lack.

Alternatively:



Almost the same map, but the flip of Wisconsin and Iowa indicate that Ohio stands alone among the midwestern states. In this case, Ohio and Indiana converge, as they've been doing in Trump approval polls. Both states are decided by razor-thin margins, such that they're the two states that voted the closest in the entire nation and maybe even take a couple days to call. However, the difference in percentage just happens to be on opposite sides of the partisan dividing line.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,641
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2017, 11:45:39 AM »

For the immediate future, a Democratic landslide featuring a Republican candidate from Ohio might do the trick. For the distant future, you'd have to see some city in Indiana see really explosive growth for some reason, so that state becomes more urban than Ohio, which is difficult to imagine.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,678
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2017, 12:14:12 PM »

The Demographics of Indiana and Ohio are almost the same,  Ohio just has more large metros than Indiana is what makes Ohio more competitive politically.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,053
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2017, 12:37:29 PM »

The Demographics of Indiana and Ohio are almost the same,  Ohio just has more large metros than Indiana is what makes Ohio more competitive politically.

40% of Indiana's population lives in either Northwest Indiana (811,009) - which is pretty much just an extension of Chicagoland - or the greater Indianapolis area (1,843,620).  Once you add in the Cincinnati (77,978) and Louisville (284,247) suburbs, you're up to 45% of the population.  That isn't counting the following areas that are definitely not rural (population instate, only):

Fort Wayne (431,802)
Evansville (298,805)
South Bend (268,447)
Elkhart (203,781)
Terre Haute (170,687)
Bloomington (166,336)

Adding all of those in, and you get to 4,556,712, good for 69% of Indiana's population.  The reason it's so Republican is not because rural areas outvote urban ones; it's because the suburbs of those areas are very, very Republican.  TBH, the same is true of Ohio, too.  Ohio is not a rural/urban divide; the GOP does quite well in the suburbs there.
Logged
TheLeftwardTide
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 988
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2017, 12:56:23 PM »

Under Trump, an economic recession to the severity of 2008 occurs once more in December 2019. Trump declines to run for reelection as his approval rating slip's into the low 20s. Kasich ends up winning the Republican nomination, while Sanders ends up winning the Democratic nomination. The following election is, due to the economy, a Democratic landslide, with Kasich just barely pulling it out in Ohio.

Not a likely scenario, but nor is the idea of Indiana going D and Ohio going R.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,678
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2017, 01:27:16 PM »

The Demographics of Indiana and Ohio are almost the same,  Ohio just has more large metros than Indiana is what makes Ohio more competitive politically.

40% of Indiana's population lives in either Northwest Indiana (811,009) - which is pretty much just an extension of Chicagoland - or the greater Indianapolis area (1,843,620).  Once you add in the Cincinnati (77,978) and Louisville (284,247) suburbs, you're up to 45% of the population.  That isn't counting the following areas that are definitely not rural (population instate, only):

Fort Wayne (431,802)
Evansville (298,805)
South Bend (268,447)
Elkhart (203,781)
Terre Haute (170,687)
Bloomington (166,336)

Adding all of those in, and you get to 4,556,712, good for 69% of Indiana's population.  The reason it's so Republican is not because rural areas outvote urban ones; it's because the suburbs of those areas are very, very Republican.  TBH, the same is true of Ohio, too.  Ohio is not a rural/urban divide; the GOP does quite well in the suburbs there.

I guess I should say "large" metro.   Places like Elkhart or Bloomington are really what I was thinking of.
Logged
Anzeigenhauptmeister
Hades
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,375
Israel


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2017, 02:09:35 PM »

What if Sanders would have been the Democratic nominee and Trump hadn't chosen someone from the Midwest. Could he have won Indiana and lose Ohio?
The first was surprisingly won by him in the primary, the latter was won in a landslide by Hillary.
Logged
Kyle Rittenhouse is a Political Prisoner
Jalawest2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,480


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 24, 2017, 02:15:53 PM »

What if Sanders would have been the Democratic nominee and Trump hadn't chosen someone from the Midwest. Could he have won Indiana and lose Ohio?
The first was surprisingly won by him in the primary, the latter was won in a landslide by Hillary.
He wouldn't have won either, and I wouldn't think Ohio would be closer.
Logged
Anzeigenhauptmeister
Hades
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,375
Israel


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2017, 03:34:59 PM »

What if Sanders would have been the Democratic nominee and Trump hadn't chosen someone from the Midwest. Could he have won Indiana and lose Ohio?
The first was surprisingly won by him in the primary, the latter was won in a landslide by Hillary.
He wouldn't have won either, and I wouldn't think Ohio would be closer.

Why did Hillary overperform so much in the Ohio and Pennsylvania primaries? That doesn't make much sense in retrospect.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2017, 04:41:55 PM »

2009-2017: Hillary Clinton/Evan Bayh


292: Vice President Evan Bayh/Senator Joe Sestak - 47.2%
246: Governor Nikki Haley/Senator Rob Portman - 46.2%

OR, in the future of 2032:

269(273): President Elise Stefanik/Vice President Sarah LaTourette - 49.4%
269(265): Governor Pete Buttigieg/Senator Robert Kennedy Jr. - 48.5%
Logged
TheLeftwardTide
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 988
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2017, 01:06:45 PM »

Kingpoleon, why do you think that Robert Kennedy Jr can win statewide in Alabama in the 2020s?
Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2017, 02:39:06 PM »

Kingpoleon, why do you think that Robert Kennedy Jr can win statewide in Alabama in the 2020s?

I've noticed that his maps almost always have the Democrat over-performing in the South for some reason.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.231 seconds with 10 queries.