Why was California only Likely D in 2000? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 06, 2024, 08:10:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was California only Likely D in 2000? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was California only Likely D in 2000?  (Read 1559 times)
TheLeftwardTide
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 988
« on: August 29, 2017, 11:31:09 PM »

It wasn't "Safe R" at any point after 1960 when JFK initially won the state, with the exceptions of 1980 and the two landslides (where the state was actually to the left of the nation just ftr)

But the answer is that Bush tried to make inroads, and failed.

California went Republican every year from 1952-1988 except for the LBJ '64 landslide.

California was more red in 1984 than Texas was in 2012.

What part of "with the exceptions of 1980 and the two landslides do you not understand"?

Discounting those, California never went R by more than 4 points. It's little different from Wisconsin's D Lean that only gave out this time because Hillary failed to visit....that and the Cheesehead Mafia working overtime.

You did make a mistake in saying that California went to JFK in 1960...it didn't. Other than that, your general idea is much more correct.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.