AFP plans (at least) $125 million spending spree
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 04:22:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  AFP plans (at least) $125 million spending spree
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AFP plans (at least) $125 million spending spree  (Read 421 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 11, 2014, 09:39:55 AM »

Arrticle.

[quote]The Koch brothers’ main political arm intends to spend more than $125 million this year on an aggressive ground, air and data operation benefiting conservatives, according to a memo distributed to major donors and sources familiar with the group.

The projected budget for Americans for Prosperity would be unprecedented for a private political group in a midterm, and would likely rival even the spending of the Republican and Democratic parties’ congressional campaign arms.

The group already has spent more than $35 million on ads attacking vulnerable Democrats in key Senate and House races, according to sources, including Sens. Kay Hagan of North Carolina, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Mark Pryor of Arkansas. The $125 million projection comes from a memo obtained by POLITICO, labeled as a “Confidential Investor Update” provided to major donors in March, but a source familiar with AFP called the figure a “very conservative estimate. We’re on track for more than that.”

The goal of the network is a long-term movement to expand the political playing field for conservatives — both into new states and into non-traditional demographics including millennial, Hispanic and low-income voters.

AFP’s $125 million projected 2014 budget alone would also exceed the total 2012 fundraising hauls of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee or the National
/quote]
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,518
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2014, 09:49:14 AM »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_Arkansas,_2010
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_Connecticut,_2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_Connecticut,_2010
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_gubernatorial_election,_2010
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2014, 10:05:31 AM »

2 self-funders in blue states? What does that have to with AFP?
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,518
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2014, 10:09:52 AM »

2 self-funders in blue states? What does that have to with AFP?
I just show that money doesn't make all.

Lincoln outspent Boozman heavily, Mcmahon spent more than 50 millions for each campaign, and Meg Whitman spent more than 100 million for her campaign.

And they all lose, badly.

Yes, having money is a +, but if the Koch Brothers believe they will buy the Republican Senate Majority, they're wrong.

Republicans can (and right know it's more likely than not) gain the senate, but if they manage to win, the first reason will be because Obama/the democrats would be unpopular.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,820


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 11, 2014, 07:54:43 PM »


Usually the candidate with the most money wins. If you want an even better example of epic fail with a lot of money, try this one.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_gubernatorial_election,_2002
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2014, 05:59:08 PM »

Yes, it is message relatively to money that matters.


Once you pass a certain threshold you have diminishing returns, more money for ads beyond that point is wasted. If the ads are garbage, it is wasted. If your message is good, you can win with an inferior amount of money.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 10 queries.