Republican Parties of the Western states: Why so conservative? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 08:34:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Republican Parties of the Western states: Why so conservative? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Republican Parties of the Western states: Why so conservative?  (Read 4638 times)
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


« on: November 19, 2012, 04:56:06 PM »

the Western states were traditionally the base of conservatism republicanism. Looking at old almanacs, the republicans in upstate California, Oregon, California were mostly of the LaFollette mold. Think of guys like McCloskey, Hatfield, Packwood, Pritchard etc.


The parts of the west known as the sunbelt or areas with large mormon populations was where the bulk of the far right guys were. Even 30 years ago, there were a lot of far right guys from the west:

Bob Dornan
Bill Dannemeyer
Carlos Moorhead
David Dreier (especially early in his career)
Duncan Hunter Sr
Dan Lungren
Paul Laxalt
Barry Goldwater Sr and Jr
Bob Stump
Eldon Rudd
Orrin Hatch
Jake Garn
Steve Symms
James McClure
James Hansen
Larry Craig
Malcolm Wallop
Bill Armstrong
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2012, 04:58:36 PM »

Because moderate Republicans don't exist anymore and the GOP base is coming from far right areas. It's not like California has any moderate Bay Area Republicans to balance it out anymore for example.

I suppose that's true, yeah. Also, the Bay Area used to have some quite conservative areas. Key words being, used to.

that's not really true except for maybe the Tri Valley area. If I recall, they elected a far right congressman for a few years in the 90s (Baker).
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2012, 10:23:51 PM »

Because moderate Republicans don't exist anymore and the GOP base is coming from far right areas. It's not like California has any moderate Bay Area Republicans to balance it out anymore for example.

I suppose that's true, yeah. Also, the Bay Area used to have some quite conservative areas. Key words being, used to.

that's not really true except for maybe the Tri Valley area. If I recall, they elected a far right congressman for a few years in the 90s (Baker).

Uh, heard of Charles Gubser? He was pretty darned conservative for his time, especially on the military. Represented San Jose and other parts of Santa Clara County from the 50s o the 70s.

I always found it interesting how in Silicon Valley you had someone like Gubser whose voting record was close to the median republican (and very conservative by bay area standards) and right next door was Don Edwards, who was a fellow traveler.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2012, 09:42:17 PM »

The California GOP is now essentially a social club for Inland Empire fundies.
 Keep it up and you won't be able to find Republicans in Colorado other than the Bible thumpers in Fort Collins and the farmers in the eastern plains.

if you look at most maps, those two areas you mentioned are not fundie strongholds. Granted, there might be a lot of under-the-radar "independent" churches that are defacto fundie but I always thought that the Inland Empire was a mix between catholic, mainline and a lot of unchurched. Fort Collins I'd guess would be a mix between mainline protestants and the unchurched.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 26, 2012, 05:59:19 PM »

The California GOP is now essentially a social club for Inland Empire fundies.
 Keep it up and you won't be able to find Republicans in Colorado other than the Bible thumpers in Fort Collins and the farmers in the eastern plains.

if you look at most maps, those two areas you mentioned are not fundie strongholds. Granted, there might be a lot of under-the-radar "independent" churches that are defacto fundie but I always thought that the Inland Empire was a mix between catholic, mainline and a lot of unchurched. Fort Collins I'd guess would be a mix between mainline protestants and the unchurched.

The inland empire certainly has a lot of fundie influence. And yes, lots of conservative Catholics as well. The same goes for a lot of Southern California actually.

there is no county in CA where more than ten percent of the population is baptist
http://bowdenblog.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/bible_belt_map_baptist.gif
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2012, 12:00:25 AM »

The California GOP is now essentially a social club for Inland Empire fundies.
 Keep it up and you won't be able to find Republicans in Colorado other than the Bible thumpers in Fort Collins and the farmers in the eastern plains.

if you look at most maps, those two areas you mentioned are not fundie strongholds. Granted, there might be a lot of under-the-radar "independent" churches that are defacto fundie but I always thought that the Inland Empire was a mix between catholic, mainline and a lot of unchurched. Fort Collins I'd guess would be a mix between mainline protestants and the unchurched.

The inland empire certainly has a lot of fundie influence. And yes, lots of conservative Catholics as well. The same goes for a lot of Southern California actually.

there is no county in CA where more than ten percent of the population is baptist
http://bowdenblog.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/bible_belt_map_baptist.gif

Going by this logic, you don't think rural North Dakota is socially conservative either?

I was going to mention that fundies in California aren't southern baptists, but didn't think it would be necessary. Guess I was wrong. There are plenty of conservative evangelicals and socially conservative catholics in California. They just don't live in West LA. And many of the socially conservative catholics vote Democrat.

well I do think that the IE is a fairly socon place. Prop 8 did very well there. It seems like back when LA County was whiter, I would assume that there would be a lot of interracial polarization with the South Bay, Gateway Cities and SGV whites being republican and the West LA whites voting heavily democrat. I think part of that would be from the type of people who originally settled those areas.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,832
United States


« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2012, 01:11:31 AM »

does anyone here agree with me that Los Angeles county sort of has an east west divide? The western part is/was culturally more northeastern while the east side is/was culturally more like Missouri or Arkansas. That's obviously a hasty generalization but back when the area was mostly white, would you agree?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 12 queries.