1964: JFK versus Goldwater. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 08:41:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1964: JFK versus Goldwater. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1964: JFK versus Goldwater.  (Read 3347 times)
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« on: September 06, 2015, 03:44:30 PM »


384 - 154
John F. Kennedy(D-MA)/Stuart Symington(D-MO) - 53.6%
Barry Goldwater(R-AZ)/Spiro Agnew(R-MD) - 46.0%

+7.5% GOP

A marginal victory of seven and a half points.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2015, 04:36:47 PM »

JFK would push for civil rights, too. With that, Goldwater either gets a "Southern moderate" or a former Democrat like Smathers or somesuch to begin the Southern strategy.

I suspect Johnson would be dumped in 1964 for the same reasons Agnew nearly was in 1972. With him gone, JFK chooses Symington for great foreign policy experience.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2015, 09:37:20 PM »

I think the map which bobloblaw constructed. The idea that JFK going to Dallas to bolster his support in Texas in '64, suggests to me that LBJ was staying on the ticket and the fact that Texas was very much on JFK's radar, meant that LBJ was central to JFK's reelection prospects.  Symington he didn't much know about, while LBJ whatever the personal issues were, was easier to keep than dump. Symington wasn't owed anything by JFK, where as LBJ ensured victory for JFK in 1960. There was also the matter of institutional and political memory to consider. Keeping LBJ was also tidier politically and JFK was no fool.

You do understand JFK would have later met with Coke Stevenson?

I suspect Stevenson wanted Kennedy to convince Connally to lead a coup against Johnson. Kennedy's reported planned meeting afterwards with Stevenson is actually one of the few pieces of evidence favoring a Johnson-assassination plot against Kennedy.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2015, 05:08:37 PM »

I think the map which bobloblaw constructed. The idea that JFK going to Dallas to bolster his support in Texas in '64, suggests to me that LBJ was staying on the ticket and the fact that Texas was very much on JFK's radar, meant that LBJ was central to JFK's reelection prospects.  Symington he didn't much know about, while LBJ whatever the personal issues were, was easier to keep than dump. Symington wasn't owed anything by JFK, where as LBJ ensured victory for JFK in 1960. There was also the matter of institutional and political memory to consider. Keeping LBJ was also tidier politically and JFK was no fool.

You do understand JFK would have later met with Coke Stevenson?

I suspect Stevenson wanted Kennedy to convince Connally to lead a coup against Johnson. Kennedy's reported planned meeting afterwards with Stevenson is actually one of the few pieces of evidence favoring a Johnson-assassination plot against Kennedy.
crazytown
I agree with you that Johnson didn't assassinate Kennedy. Is that what you're saying?

I disagree if you're denying that he was meeting with non-Johnson members of the Texas establishment.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.