Democrats and Republicans: No Compromise Anymore? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 08:46:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Democrats and Republicans: No Compromise Anymore? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democrats and Republicans: No Compromise Anymore?  (Read 2486 times)
anvi
anvikshiki
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,400
Netherlands


« on: August 16, 2011, 11:47:32 AM »

Compromise is still how legislation gets passed, no matter which team is running the show.  But party bases have been conditioned to consider it a dirty word.  GOP candidates delight their bases with promises never to compromise, and Democratic presidents get lambasted for it from their base.  I don't really know to what degree it's always been this way or whether the current media environment has made it worse.  It's just too bad it's such a pejorative in politics, and it only promises candidates and office-holders ever diminishing returns from voters.  If people didn't compromise constantly every day, they wouldn't ever cease from killing each other.  Social contract theory is based on compromise, for those who still hold it, anyway (I don't, but many do).  My own experience with "office politics" attests to the fact that, if it weren't for compromise, whole departments would just fall to pieces almost immediately.  Family life depends on it.  So, what, we reward politicians for promising not to do something that we all have to do every day in every sphere of our lives?  People are crazy.  Tongue
Logged
anvi
anvikshiki
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,400
Netherlands


« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2011, 09:57:22 AM »

"Compromise" is the buzzword spoken by Democrats when they no longer have the votes to pass legislation without Republican votes. Of course, "compromise" to them means achieving their objectives more slowly, with Republicans abandoning their objectives altogether.

From S&P statement justifying U.S. credit downgrade, 8/5/11

http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/articles/en/us/?assetID=1245316529563

"We lowered our long-term rating on the U.S. because we believe that the
prolonged controversy over raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related
fiscal policy debate indicate that further near-term progress containing the
growth in public spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an
agreement on raising revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and
will remain a contentious and fitful process...
The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as
America's governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective,
and less predictable than what we previously believed. The statutory debt
ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in
the debate over fiscal policy. Despite this year's wide-ranging debate, in our
view, the differences between political parties have proven to be
extraordinarily difficult to bridge, and, as we see it, the resulting
agreement fell well short of the comprehensive fiscal consolidation program
that some proponents had envisaged until quite recently."
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.