PR Flag in NJ Vandalized: Swastika Painted Over It

[Dr. Arch]

Being reported now in local Puerto Rican news sources. Man identified as a Trump supporter, Thomas Tyler.



Source: https://www.wapa.tv/noticias/internacionales/vandalizan-bandera-puertorriquena-en-nueva-jersey_20131122398899.html

[dead0man]

hey, you might actually have it right this time!  Lets keep our fingers crossed.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

At least he didn't burn down the building saying "Nazi Puerto Ricans get out."

Secondly the man in question hired the artist to paint something on one of properties, and the guy painted a Puerto Rican flag without his permission and against his wishes. The real vandal is the artist. The swastika was of course unnecessary but in his mind he saw it as responding to a ridiculous statement with a ridiculous statement.

[Dr. Arch]

At least he didn't burn down the building saying "Nazi Puerto Ricans get out."

Secondly the man in question hired the artist to paint something on one of properties, and the guy painted a Puerto Rican flag without his permission and against his wishes. The real vandal is the artist. The swastika was of course unnecessary but in his mind he saw it as responding to a ridiculous statement with a ridiculous statement.

The flag is "something." He asked for a mural, not something in specific. There is no vandalism here if the owner consented to the building being painted.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

At least he didn't burn down the building saying "Nazi Puerto Ricans get out."

Secondly the man in question hired the artist to paint something on one of properties, and the guy painted a Puerto Rican flag without his permission and against his wishes. The real vandal is the artist. The swastika was of course unnecessary but in his mind he saw it as responding to a ridiculous statement with a ridiculous statement.

The flag is "something." He asked for a mural, not something in specific. There is no vandalism here if the owner consented to the building being painted.

It's his building. The artist got paid. The owner can do what he wants to the mural. He can replace it with a mural of Evil Canevil. He can piss on it (if he likes wiping piss of his door-and if he wants to pay the fine for public urination) for all he cares too.

[Dr. Arch]

At least he didn't burn down the building saying "Nazi Puerto Ricans get out."

Secondly the man in question hired the artist to paint something on one of properties, and the guy painted a Puerto Rican flag without his permission and against his wishes. The real vandal is the artist. The swastika was of course unnecessary but in his mind he saw it as responding to a ridiculous statement with a ridiculous statement.

The flag is "something." He asked for a mural, not something in specific. There is no vandalism here if the owner consented to the building being painted.

It's his building. The artist got paid. The owner can do what he wants to the mural. He can replace it with a mural of Evil Canevil. He can piss on it (if he likes wiping piss of his door-and if he wants to pay the fine for public urination) for all he cares too.

Yeah, it's absolutely fine that he put a swastika over it because he didn't like it. Yep. There's nothing wrong at all. Keep telling yourself that in your tacit approval of racism.

One thing is painting it over; another is putting a swastika on it. That's sending a public message about what he thinks, and people like you just turn a blind eye to it.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

At least he didn't burn down the building saying "Nazi Puerto Ricans get out."

Secondly the man in question hired the artist to paint something on one of properties, and the guy painted a Puerto Rican flag without his permission and against his wishes. The real vandal is the artist. The swastika was of course unnecessary but in his mind he saw it as responding to a ridiculous statement with a ridiculous statement.

The flag is "something." He asked for a mural, not something in specific. There is no vandalism here if the owner consented to the building being painted.

It's his building. The artist got paid. The owner can do what he wants to the mural. He can replace it with a mural of Evil Canevil. He can piss on it (if he likes wiping piss of his door-and if he wants to pay the fine for public urination) for all he cares too.

Yeah, it's absolutely fine that he put a swastika over it because he didn't like it. Yep. There's nothing wrong at all. Keep telling yourself that in your tacit approval of racism.

One thing is painting it over; another is putting a swastika on it. That's sending a public message about what he thinks, and people like you just turn a blind eye to it.

A racist guy externalized his internalized racism in a rash reaction. That isn't a hate crime. That isn't an act of violence. That isn't even an article of news. I don't see what this has to do with anything aside from an attempt to smear the President after your last fifteen examples have been disproved, incident after incident.

[Dr. Arch]

At least he didn't burn down the building saying "Nazi Puerto Ricans get out."

Secondly the man in question hired the artist to paint something on one of properties, and the guy painted a Puerto Rican flag without his permission and against his wishes. The real vandal is the artist. The swastika was of course unnecessary but in his mind he saw it as responding to a ridiculous statement with a ridiculous statement.

The flag is "something." He asked for a mural, not something in specific. There is no vandalism here if the owner consented to the building being painted.

It's his building. The artist got paid. The owner can do what he wants to the mural. He can replace it with a mural of Evil Canevil. He can piss on it (if he likes wiping piss of his door-and if he wants to pay the fine for public urination) for all he cares too.

Yeah, it's absolutely fine that he put a swastika over it because he didn't like it. Yep. There's nothing wrong at all. Keep telling yourself that in your tacit approval of racism.

One thing is painting it over; another is putting a swastika on it. That's sending a public message about what he thinks, and people like you just turn a blind eye to it.

A racist guy externalized his internalized racism in a rash reaction. That isn't a hate crime. That isn't an act of violence. That isn't even an article of news. I don't see what this has to do with anything aside from an attempt to smear the President after your last fifteen examples have been disproved, incident after incident.

45 does enough to smear himself. This is about his supporters and how other supporters, like you, would rather dance the Tarantella with semantics rather than saying anything about it. This is what creates the incendiary racially-charged environment in this country. Nobody from the pertinent side wants to talk about it.

What the hell other 15 examples are you talking about?

[Santander]

Because nobody ever did such things when Obama was in power, right?

[Dr. Arch]

Because nobody ever did such things when Obama was in power, right?

Sure did, but were they Obama supporters? If so, did Obama supporters start making excuses and deflecting?

[DrScholl]

I bet he doesn't even know that Puerto Rico is part of the United States. All he did was give himself a bad name, so the gag is on him.

[Green Line]

Sounds like fascist Puerto Rican Nationalists to me.  Hunt them down.

[Dr. Arch]

Sounds like fascist Puerto Rican Nationalists to me.  Hunt them down.

[Badger]

At least he didn't burn down the building saying "Nazi Puerto Ricans get out."

Secondly the man in question hired the artist to paint something on one of properties, and the guy painted a Puerto Rican flag without his permission and against his wishes. The real vandal is the artist. The swastika was of course unnecessary but in his mind he saw it as responding to a ridiculous statement with a ridiculous statement.

The flag is "something." He asked for a mural, not something in specific. There is no vandalism here if the owner consented to the building being painted.

It's his building. The artist got paid. The owner can do what he wants to the mural. He can replace it with a mural of Evil Canevil. He can piss on it (if he likes wiping piss of his door-and if he wants to pay the fine for public urination) for all he cares too.

Yeah, it's absolutely fine that he put a swastika over it because he didn't like it. Yep. There's nothing wrong at all. Keep telling yourself that in your tacit approval of racism.

One thing is painting it over; another is putting a swastika on it. That's sending a public message about what he thinks, and people like you just turn a blind eye to it.

A racist guy externalized his internalized racism in a rash reaction. That isn't a hate crime. That isn't an act of violence. That isn't even an article of news. I don't see what this has to do with anything aside from an attempt to smear the President after your last fifteen examples have been disproved, incident after incident.

45 does enough to smear himself. This is about his supporters and how other supporters, like you, would rather dance the Tarantella with semantics rather than saying anything about it. This is what creates the incendiary racially-charged environment in this country. Nobody from the pertinent side wants to talk about it.

What the hell other 15 examples are you talking about?

[Badger]

At least he didn't burn down the building saying "Nazi Puerto Ricans get out."

Secondly the man in question hired the artist to paint something on one of properties, and the guy painted a Puerto Rican flag without his permission and against his wishes. The real vandal is the artist. The swastika was of course unnecessary but in his mind he saw it as responding to a ridiculous statement with a ridiculous statement.

The flag is "something." He asked for a mural, not something in specific. There is no vandalism here if the owner consented to the building being painted.

It's his building. The artist got paid. The owner can do what he wants to the mural. He can replace it with a mural of Evil Canevil. He can piss on it (if he likes wiping piss of his door-and if he wants to pay the fine for public urination) for all he cares too.

Yeah, it's absolutely fine that he put a swastika over it because he didn't like it. Yep. There's nothing wrong at all. Keep telling yourself that in your tacit approval of racism.

One thing is painting it over; another is putting a swastika on it. That's sending a public message about what he thinks, and people like you just turn a blind eye to it.

A racist guy externalized his internalized racism in a rash reaction. That isn't a hate crime. That isn't an act of violence. That isn't even an article of news. I don't see what this has to do with anything aside from an attempt to smear the President after your last fifteen examples have been disproved, incident after incident.

Those old red bootlaces in the box under your closet are really calling, huh Sanchez?

[Inmate Trump]

What's telling is that the fact he's a Trump supporter didn't even need to be said.