1996 with a Stronger Perot
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 04:48:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1996 with a Stronger Perot
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1996 with a Stronger Perot  (Read 483 times)
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 23, 2015, 04:27:40 PM »

All right. Let's say in 1993 Perot doesn't do as bad as he did on Larry King vs Gore on NAFTFA. A lot of people consider that the start of his downfall as many folks believe Gore won the debate and made Ross look silly.

With Perot not as down he still has a major following like in 1992. 1994 mid terms happen the same with some strong Independent showings here and there, and the Reps take both houses. He forms the Reform party in late 1994 with three main goals: 1. Get 5% in 1996 Presidential election, 2. Seriously compete in congress elections, 3. Compete in statewide elections.

Everything in RL happens as it did with the shutdown and all that.

Clinton/Gore is renominated in 1996, and Dole wins easily in a rather lame Republican primary. Instead of going with Kemp he picks John McCain as his VP. Perot decides to get a well known politician to run with him this time that isn't a cliched pick either, his choice? David Boren a former Democrat. Perot is mostly like in 1992 but centers some more on some (not many but some,) issues.

Who Wins? Does Perot get 5%? How does Nader do?
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2015, 06:00:29 PM »

Perot might get a Buchanan-Nader anti-establishment, fair trade coalition. If he really wants to do well, Eugene McCarthy, Ron Paul, or John B. Anderson would be best, while Gerald Ford would be an excellent person to pick if he wants to do really well.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.211 seconds with 14 queries.