CONGRESSIONAL RESULTS MEGA THREAD
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 04:14:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  CONGRESSIONAL RESULTS MEGA THREAD
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 ... 89
Author Topic: CONGRESSIONAL RESULTS MEGA THREAD  (Read 68769 times)
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1625 on: November 23, 2020, 04:39:42 PM »


McSally did slightly better in suburban AZ-06 than in 2018.

Edit: Also, Kelly did 5 points better in AZ-02 than Sinema. Both Kelly and McSally live in AZ-02.

It's astonishing that Democrats still couldn't flip AZ-06, either for Congress, President, or Senate. The congressional districts broke just as they did in 2018, except that Kelly did better in AZ-02, as you noted, than Sinema, and probably outperformed her slightly everywhere else.
Logged
AncestralDemocrat.
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,446
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1626 on: November 23, 2020, 04:55:13 PM »



lmao..
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,887


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1627 on: November 23, 2020, 05:33:54 PM »



This is so ridiculous lol. Why do they not keep track of what vote were counted? I'm guessing this would necessitate a recount and that'll take forever as well.

Logged

NYDem
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,223
United States Minor Outlying Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1628 on: November 23, 2020, 05:44:13 PM »



If this keeps up I think they might not certify. We could have an NC-09 situation here if they can't determine which ballots have already been counted and if the counted ballots are valid.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,082
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1629 on: November 23, 2020, 05:46:24 PM »



If this keeps up I think they might not certify. We could have an NC-09 situation here if they can't determine which ballots have already been counted and if the counted ballots are valid.

Throw the state of New York out and just start over. This is a failed state. I literally have more faith in Iran's government than I do in New York's.
Logged
VAR
VARepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,753
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1630 on: November 23, 2020, 05:48:50 PM »

lfromnj should rename the thread "Crisis in NY-22".
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,146


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1631 on: November 23, 2020, 05:51:32 PM »

AZ-01 seems like a pretty vulnerable district in 2022 if it remains similar, the Dem wins there have been underwhelming.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,648
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1632 on: November 23, 2020, 05:53:16 PM »

New York new YOOOOORKKK
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,082
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1633 on: November 23, 2020, 05:56:30 PM »


No offense to your home state, but this is literally the kind of s**t that would prompt a UN intervention in almost any other country.
Logged
ChiefFireWaterMike
LordRichard
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,355


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1634 on: November 23, 2020, 05:57:03 PM »


If this keeps up I think they might not certify. We could have an NC-09 situation here if they can't determine which ballots have already been counted and if the counted ballots are valid.

Throw the state of New York out and just start over. This is a failed state. I literally have more faith in Iran's government than I do in New York's.
What the fck, the actual fck.
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,059


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1635 on: November 23, 2020, 06:07:17 PM »

New IA-02 recount numbers:

Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,648
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1636 on: November 23, 2020, 06:20:37 PM »

As a New Yorker I welcome international intervention and military operations to disarm New York, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger.
Logged
n1240
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,207


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1637 on: November 23, 2020, 06:23:08 PM »

New IA-02 recount numbers:





Looks like it is now down to a 6 vote difference.
Logged
Perlen vor den Schweinen
kongress
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 971
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1638 on: November 23, 2020, 06:23:20 PM »



Ha Ha Ha...... YES!!!
Logged
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,656


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1639 on: November 23, 2020, 06:23:50 PM »
« Edited: November 23, 2020, 06:27:56 PM by 2016 »

Miller-Meeks Campaign says Recount in Scott County is "Illegal":
https://kwwl.com/2020/11/22/miller-meeks-campaign-calls-scott-county-recount-illegal-in-dist-2-race/
The Campaign says that Scott County used a "Hybrid" Model which isn't allowed under Iowa Election Law. The Iowa Secretary of State's Office specifically said Counties must either use "Iowa's reliable Optical Scanners" or do it by "Hand" but not both which Scott County did.

"Iowa law requires a recount in each precinct to be conducted either by Iowa’s reliable optical-scan ballot tabulating equipment or by a hand count. The Iowa Secretary of State has instructed recount boards to use one or the other, but not to combine the two. Most recount boards have complied with that law, but the Hart campaign has advocated for an illegal “hybrid” model in Democrat-leaning counties. The Scott County recount board, over the Miller-Meeks for Congress campaign’s objection and against the instructions of the Secretary of State, adopted this method."

Conclusion: This will end up in Court as well especially if Hart gets ahead!
Logged
StateBoiler
fe234
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,890


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1640 on: November 23, 2020, 09:40:18 PM »

Just read this New York reporter's Twitter for the past day for NY-22. https://mobile.twitter.com/JRosenblattTV

Seems the only solution in Oneida County is zero out the count and start over.
Logged
BudgieForce
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,298


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1641 on: November 23, 2020, 09:51:49 PM »

Miller-Meeks Campaign says Recount in Scott County is "Illegal":
https://kwwl.com/2020/11/22/miller-meeks-campaign-calls-scott-county-recount-illegal-in-dist-2-race/
The Campaign says that Scott County used a "Hybrid" Model which isn't allowed under Iowa Election Law. The Iowa Secretary of State's Office specifically said Counties must either use "Iowa's reliable Optical Scanners" or do it by "Hand" but not both which Scott County did.

"Iowa law requires a recount in each precinct to be conducted either by Iowa’s reliable optical-scan ballot tabulating equipment or by a hand count. The Iowa Secretary of State has instructed recount boards to use one or the other, but not to combine the two. Most recount boards have complied with that law, but the Hart campaign has advocated for an illegal “hybrid” model in Democrat-leaning counties. The Scott County recount board, over the Miller-Meeks for Congress campaign’s objection and against the instructions of the Secretary of State, adopted this method."

Conclusion: This will end up in Court as well especially if Hart gets ahead!

They did the machine recount and then checked the ballots that couldn't be scanned?

Seems petty.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,082
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1642 on: November 23, 2020, 10:02:39 PM »

In case we needed further proof that CA-21 is over:

Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1643 on: November 23, 2020, 10:36:36 PM »


McSally did slightly better in suburban AZ-06 than in 2018.

Edit: Also, Kelly did 5 points better in AZ-02 than Sinema. Both Kelly and McSally live in AZ-02.

It's astonishing that Democrats still couldn't flip AZ-06, either for Congress, President, or Senate. The congressional districts broke just as they did in 2018, except that Kelly did better in AZ-02, as you noted, than Sinema, and probably outperformed her slightly everywhere else.

wow McSally did worse in az 2nd than the rando running against ann kirkpatrick, 55.1-44.9 kirkpatrick wins, 55.7-44.3 kelly wins
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,146


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1644 on: November 24, 2020, 12:44:04 AM »

McSally clearly blew a very winnable race, rather than just turning a narrow loss into a bigger one. Hopefully this error comes back to haunt the Republican Party.
Logged
VAR
VARepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,753
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1645 on: November 24, 2020, 03:19:24 AM »

Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,564


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1646 on: November 24, 2020, 06:16:17 AM »

If Ossoff can improve his GA-06 margins to McBath-levels, he could win the whole race.
Logged
JMT
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,138


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1647 on: November 24, 2020, 12:13:32 PM »

Per Dave Wasserman, the Hart campaign claims that updated recount totals will show Rita Hart ahead by 3 votes.



This is just so close.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,648
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1648 on: November 24, 2020, 12:15:42 PM »

With a margin that close, there's a legitimate argument to hold a special
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,302
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1649 on: November 24, 2020, 12:16:23 PM »

Per Dave Wasserman, the Hart campaign claims that updated recount totals will show Rita Hart ahead by 3 votes.



This is just so close.

"Obviously it's because they 'found' votes for the Democrat, another election stolen thanks to liberal voter fraud!"

Am I doing this right?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 ... 89  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.071 seconds with 12 queries.