It's funny that in the case of Chamberlain treachery is refusal to stand up against a foreign dictator, whereas in the case of Lieberman treachery is standing up against a foreign dictator. Ah, the irony...
Quite
As a 'Democrat' and, a progressive, who values universal basic human rights, I've long supported an interventionist foreign policy on humanitarian grounds as much as any possibility of weapons of mass destruction
Thus, far 400,000 bodies have been found in mass graves, what is liberal or progressive about sitting idly by, doing nothing, and watching those 400,000 become 4 million? Saddam was by no means done with that
The US and the UK, with a few others, at least, had the moral backbone to do something about Saddam. To have allowed Saddam to continue the route he was going down would have been spineless
I'm seriously beginning to think some around here, who seem hell bent and condemning "pro-war" Democrats, like Lieberman, to damnation, would have sat back and rolled down for Hitler back in the 30s and 40s
Dave