Why didn't the US knock down the DPRK? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 10:06:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Why didn't the US knock down the DPRK? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why didn't the US knock down the DPRK?  (Read 1736 times)
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


« on: January 02, 2015, 04:28:25 PM »

I don't believe in North Korea posing any real danger. DPRK's leaders are everything, but not imbeciles. Sure, they can inflict a terrible damage on South Korea or Japan by launching a sudden attack, but for what purpose? The regime is preoccupied with survival.

Of course, "knocking down" DPRK wouldn't me easy. In 1994, when Clinton considered military options to stop Kim Il-sung's nuclear program, the Pentagon estimated that, while military conflict would end with certain and total victory, it would cost millions of South Korean lives and as many as 100,000 American. Now DPRK got nuclear weapon. Also, this is the most militarized society on earth (and totally indoctrinated), so I can easily say a long, guerrilla war raging long after the government itself collapses.

And if North Korea doesn't pose a real threat to the United States' interests, why to get into this mess?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.