Senate cycles where one party didnt have to defend a single open seat (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 12:54:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Senate cycles where one party didnt have to defend a single open seat (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Senate cycles where one party didnt have to defend a single open seat  (Read 482 times)
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,638
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70
« on: October 09, 2012, 05:42:31 AM »
In 2006 the Pubbies only defended one. Yet they still lost the Senate....
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,638
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2012, 08:03:41 AM »
Quote from: Mr.Phips on October 09, 2012, 06:47:15 AM
Quote from: SoIA morgieb on October 09, 2012, 05:42:31 AM
In 2006 the Pubbies only defended one. Yet they still lost the Senate....

Same with Democrats in 2002. 
Well tbf they had more seats than us at the time.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.