Klobuchar going all in on Trump-Russia connection

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Why does this Russia meme resonate so much with boring middle class White women?

It's ironic when in 2012 they were all laughing at Romney for wanting a 1980s-era policy regarding Russia. A lot of it is just uncritically regurgitating NYT talking points, to be honest.

In 2012 Russia had not done any of the stuff it's hated for now. The same people who accuse the Klobuchars of wanting to 'start WW3' are also the ones who see things in black and white: as if an country must be permanently Good or Evil for all of history. Instead of looking at the Democrats' attempted friendliness towards Russia in 2012 as evidence that maybe we're not all unreasonably anti-Russia or looking to pick a fight, they take it as another black mark of inconsistency. The notion of judging a government on the basis of its actions escapes them.

I don't see things in black and white. Putin was a terrible leader in 2012, and is a terrible leader today, but there's no shortage of terrible leaders, and that's no reason for a new cold war. It's pathetic how many Democrats are suddenly anti Russia since the Democrats used that to try to deflect from the Wikileaks e-mails. The Democrats have really become everything I hate about Republicans.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Why does this Russia meme resonate so much with boring middle class White women?

It's ironic when in 2012 they were all laughing at Romney for wanting a 1980s-era policy regarding Russia. A lot of it is just uncritically regurgitating NYT talking points, to be honest.

In 2012 Russia had not done any of the stuff it's hated for now. The same people who accuse the Klobuchars of wanting to 'start WW3' are also the ones who see things in black and white: as if an country must be permanently Good or Evil for all of history. Instead of looking at the Democrats' attempted friendliness towards Russia in 2012 as evidence that maybe we're not all unreasonably anti-Russia or looking to pick a fight, they take it as another black mark of inconsistency. The notion of judging a government on the basis of its actions escapes them.

I don't see things in black and white. Putin was a terrible leader in 2012, and is a terrible leader today, but there's no shortage of terrible leaders, and that's no reason for a new cold war. It's pathetic how many Democrats are suddenly anti Russia since the Democrats used that to try to deflect from the Wikileaks e-mails. The Democrats have really become everything I hate about Republicans.

I don't get it; the Russians hacked them. Are they supposed to respond to that with kisses and roses? How do you think the GOP would respond if the Russians hacked the RNC and flipped the election to the Democrats, while the Democratic campaign was in touch with the Russians, and the Democratic nominee asked Russia to hack the Republican nominee? The Democrats didn't start any beef with Russia this year. The Russians started a beef with the DNC.

There's no proof that the Wikileaks e-mails came from Russia. Some UK diplomat claims he got them from an American.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Why does this Russia meme resonate so much with boring middle class White women?

It's ironic when in 2012 they were all laughing at Romney for wanting a 1980s-era policy regarding Russia. A lot of it is just uncritically regurgitating NYT talking points, to be honest.

In 2012 Russia had not done any of the stuff it's hated for now. The same people who accuse the Klobuchars of wanting to 'start WW3' are also the ones who see things in black and white: as if an country must be permanently Good or Evil for all of history. Instead of looking at the Democrats' attempted friendliness towards Russia in 2012 as evidence that maybe we're not all unreasonably anti-Russia or looking to pick a fight, they take it as another black mark of inconsistency. The notion of judging a government on the basis of its actions escapes them.

I don't see things in black and white. Putin was a terrible leader in 2012, and is a terrible leader today, but there's no shortage of terrible leaders, and that's no reason for a new cold war. It's pathetic how many Democrats are suddenly anti Russia since the Democrats used that to try to deflect from the Wikileaks e-mails. The Democrats have really become everything I hate about Republicans.

I don't get it; the Russians hacked them. Are they supposed to respond to that with kisses and roses? How do you think the GOP would respond if the Russians hacked the RNC and flipped the election to the Democrats, while the Democratic campaign was in touch with the Russians, and the Democratic nominee asked Russia to hack the Republican nominee? The Democrats didn't start any beef with Russia this year. The Russians started a beef with the DNC.

There's no proof that the Wikileaks e-mails came from Russia. Some UK diplomat claims he got them from an American.

Do you sincerely believe it didn't come from Russia? If someone put a gun to your head, and your life depended on getting the right answer, you would really claim it was an American, and not Russia?

We don't know for sure, and even if it was from Russia, the release of some factual e-mails that showed that the DNC was doing what Bernie people knew it was doing anyways certainly isn't enough to start a new cold war. We're such hypocrites since we've interfered so many times with elections around the world, including to help the guy who named Putin his successor, Yeltsin.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Why does this Russia meme resonate so much with boring middle class White women?

It's ironic when in 2012 they were all laughing at Romney for wanting a 1980s-era policy regarding Russia. A lot of it is just uncritically regurgitating NYT talking points, to be honest.

In 2012 Russia had not done any of the stuff it's hated for now. The same people who accuse the Klobuchars of wanting to 'start WW3' are also the ones who see things in black and white: as if an country must be permanently Good or Evil for all of history. Instead of looking at the Democrats' attempted friendliness towards Russia in 2012 as evidence that maybe we're not all unreasonably anti-Russia or looking to pick a fight, they take it as another black mark of inconsistency. The notion of judging a government on the basis of its actions escapes them.

I don't see things in black and white. Putin was a terrible leader in 2012, and is a terrible leader today, but there's no shortage of terrible leaders, and that's no reason for a new cold war. It's pathetic how many Democrats are suddenly anti Russia since the Democrats used that to try to deflect from the Wikileaks e-mails. The Democrats have really become everything I hate about Republicans.

I don't get it; the Russians hacked them. Are they supposed to respond to that with kisses and roses? How do you think the GOP would respond if the Russians hacked the RNC and flipped the election to the Democrats, while the Democratic campaign was in touch with the Russians, and the Democratic nominee asked Russia to hack the Republican nominee? The Democrats didn't start any beef with Russia this year. The Russians started a beef with the DNC.

There's no proof that the Wikileaks e-mails came from Russia. Some UK diplomat claims he got them from an American.

Do you sincerely believe it didn't come from Russia? If someone put a gun to your head, and your life depended on getting the right answer, you would really claim it was an American, and not Russia?

We don't know for sure, and even if it was from Russia, the release of some factual e-mails that showed that the DNC was doing what Bernie people knew it was doing anyways certainly isn't enough to start a new cold war. We're such hypocrites since we've interfered so many times with elections around the world, including to help the guy who named Putin his successor, Yeltsin. And China obviously wanted Hillary to win.

You can't even answer no to that question. All you can do is throw around a bunch of red herrings like bailing luggage from a sinking lifeboat.

Why should I have to prove that Russia wasn't involved? Did you ask every anti-war protester to prove that there wasn't WMD in Iraq?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Why does this Russia meme resonate so much with boring middle class White women?

It's ironic when in 2012 they were all laughing at Romney for wanting a 1980s-era policy regarding Russia. A lot of it is just uncritically regurgitating NYT talking points, to be honest.

In 2012 Russia had not done any of the stuff it's hated for now. The same people who accuse the Klobuchars of wanting to 'start WW3' are also the ones who see things in black and white: as if an country must be permanently Good or Evil for all of history. Instead of looking at the Democrats' attempted friendliness towards Russia in 2012 as evidence that maybe we're not all unreasonably anti-Russia or looking to pick a fight, they take it as another black mark of inconsistency. The notion of judging a government on the basis of its actions escapes them.

I don't see things in black and white. Putin was a terrible leader in 2012, and is a terrible leader today, but there's no shortage of terrible leaders, and that's no reason for a new cold war. It's pathetic how many Democrats are suddenly anti Russia since the Democrats used that to try to deflect from the Wikileaks e-mails. The Democrats have really become everything I hate about Republicans.

I don't get it; the Russians hacked them. Are they supposed to respond to that with kisses and roses? How do you think the GOP would respond if the Russians hacked the RNC and flipped the election to the Democrats, while the Democratic campaign was in touch with the Russians, and the Democratic nominee asked Russia to hack the Republican nominee? The Democrats didn't start any beef with Russia this year. The Russians started a beef with the DNC.

There's no proof that the Wikileaks e-mails came from Russia. Some UK diplomat claims he got them from an American.

Do you sincerely believe it didn't come from Russia? If someone put a gun to your head, and your life depended on getting the right answer, you would really claim it was an American, and not Russia?

We don't know for sure, and even if it was from Russia, the release of some factual e-mails that showed that the DNC was doing what Bernie people knew it was doing anyways certainly isn't enough to start a new cold war. We're such hypocrites since we've interfered so many times with elections around the world, including to help the guy who named Putin his successor, Yeltsin. And China obviously wanted Hillary to win.

You can't even answer no to that question. All you can do is throw around a bunch of red herrings like bailing luggage from a sinking lifeboat.

Why should I have to prove that Russia wasn't involved? Did you ask every anti-war protester to prove that there wasn't WMD in Iraq?

You don't have to prove anything. But clearly you think Russia was involved, and so do I, and it's not unreasonable to want to see an American president stand up for Americans, even if they happen to be in the opposite party, when they're being attacked by a foreign power.

The release of factual information that proved what the Bernie people already knew wasn't an attack on the United State.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Why does this Russia meme resonate so much with boring middle class White women?

It's ironic when in 2012 they were all laughing at Romney for wanting a 1980s-era policy regarding Russia. A lot of it is just uncritically regurgitating NYT talking points, to be honest.

In 2012 Russia had not done any of the stuff it's hated for now. The same people who accuse the Klobuchars of wanting to 'start WW3' are also the ones who see things in black and white: as if an country must be permanently Good or Evil for all of history. Instead of looking at the Democrats' attempted friendliness towards Russia in 2012 as evidence that maybe we're not all unreasonably anti-Russia or looking to pick a fight, they take it as another black mark of inconsistency. The notion of judging a government on the basis of its actions escapes them.

I don't see things in black and white. Putin was a terrible leader in 2012, and is a terrible leader today, but there's no shortage of terrible leaders, and that's no reason for a new cold war. It's pathetic how many Democrats are suddenly anti Russia since the Democrats used that to try to deflect from the Wikileaks e-mails. The Democrats have really become everything I hate about Republicans.

I don't get it; the Russians hacked them. Are they supposed to respond to that with kisses and roses? How do you think the GOP would respond if the Russians hacked the RNC and flipped the election to the Democrats, while the Democratic campaign was in touch with the Russians, and the Democratic nominee asked Russia to hack the Republican nominee? The Democrats didn't start any beef with Russia this year. The Russians started a beef with the DNC.

There's no proof that the Wikileaks e-mails came from Russia. Some UK diplomat claims he got them from an American.

Do you sincerely believe it didn't come from Russia? If someone put a gun to your head, and your life depended on getting the right answer, you would really claim it was an American, and not Russia?

We don't know for sure, and even if it was from Russia, the release of some factual e-mails that showed that the DNC was doing what Bernie people knew it was doing anyways certainly isn't enough to start a new cold war. We're such hypocrites since we've interfered so many times with elections around the world, including to help the guy who named Putin his successor, Yeltsin. And China obviously wanted Hillary to win.

You can't even answer no to that question. All you can do is throw around a bunch of red herrings like bailing luggage from a sinking lifeboat.

Why should I have to prove that Russia wasn't involved? Did you ask every anti-war protester to prove that there wasn't WMD in Iraq?

You don't have to prove anything. But clearly you think Russia was involved, and so do I, and it's not unreasonable to want to see an American president stand up for Americans, even if they happen to be in the opposite party, when they're being attacked by a foreign power.

The release of factual information that proved what the Bernie people already knew wasn't an attack on the United State.

Hacking is a crime, and hacking by the military unit of a foreign power is certainly an attack on American citizens on American soil.

You don't start a new cold war because of alleged hacking. Did Germany start a new cold war with the US when we hacked Merkel's phone? It's ridiculous that NSA and CIA supporters are trying to play the victim here.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Why does this Russia meme resonate so much with boring middle class White women?

It's ironic when in 2012 they were all laughing at Romney for wanting a 1980s-era policy regarding Russia. A lot of it is just uncritically regurgitating NYT talking points, to be honest.

In 2012 Russia had not done any of the stuff it's hated for now. The same people who accuse the Klobuchars of wanting to 'start WW3' are also the ones who see things in black and white: as if an country must be permanently Good or Evil for all of history. Instead of looking at the Democrats' attempted friendliness towards Russia in 2012 as evidence that maybe we're not all unreasonably anti-Russia or looking to pick a fight, they take it as another black mark of inconsistency. The notion of judging a government on the basis of its actions escapes them.

I don't see things in black and white. Putin was a terrible leader in 2012, and is a terrible leader today, but there's no shortage of terrible leaders, and that's no reason for a new cold war. It's pathetic how many Democrats are suddenly anti Russia since the Democrats used that to try to deflect from the Wikileaks e-mails. The Democrats have really become everything I hate about Republicans.

I don't get it; the Russians hacked them. Are they supposed to respond to that with kisses and roses? How do you think the GOP would respond if the Russians hacked the RNC and flipped the election to the Democrats, while the Democratic campaign was in touch with the Russians, and the Democratic nominee asked Russia to hack the Republican nominee? The Democrats didn't start any beef with Russia this year. The Russians started a beef with the DNC.

There's no proof that the Wikileaks e-mails came from Russia. Some UK diplomat claims he got them from an American.

Do you sincerely believe it didn't come from Russia? If someone put a gun to your head, and your life depended on getting the right answer, you would really claim it was an American, and not Russia?

We don't know for sure, and even if it was from Russia, the release of some factual e-mails that showed that the DNC was doing what Bernie people knew it was doing anyways certainly isn't enough to start a new cold war. We're such hypocrites since we've interfered so many times with elections around the world, including to help the guy who named Putin his successor, Yeltsin. And China obviously wanted Hillary to win.

You can't even answer no to that question. All you can do is throw around a bunch of red herrings like bailing luggage from a sinking lifeboat.

Why should I have to prove that Russia wasn't involved? Did you ask every anti-war protester to prove that there wasn't WMD in Iraq?

You don't have to prove anything. But clearly you think Russia was involved, and so do I, and it's not unreasonable to want to see an American president stand up for Americans, even if they happen to be in the opposite party, when they're being attacked by a foreign power.

The release of factual information that proved what the Bernie people already knew wasn't an attack on the United State.

Hacking is a crime, and hacking by the military unit of a foreign power is certainly an attack on American citizens on American soil.

You don't start a new cold war because of alleged hacking. Did Germany start a new cold war with the US when we hacked Merkel's phone?

The 'cold war' is over. No one wants to start a new cold war. But when other countries attack us, they have to be pushed back against, or they will continue to attack us with impunity.

So, how should Germany push back against us?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Why does this Russia meme resonate so much with boring middle class White women?

It's ironic when in 2012 they were all laughing at Romney for wanting a 1980s-era policy regarding Russia. A lot of it is just uncritically regurgitating NYT talking points, to be honest.

In 2012 Russia had not done any of the stuff it's hated for now. The same people who accuse the Klobuchars of wanting to 'start WW3' are also the ones who see things in black and white: as if an country must be permanently Good or Evil for all of history. Instead of looking at the Democrats' attempted friendliness towards Russia in 2012 as evidence that maybe we're not all unreasonably anti-Russia or looking to pick a fight, they take it as another black mark of inconsistency. The notion of judging a government on the basis of its actions escapes them.

I don't see things in black and white. Putin was a terrible leader in 2012, and is a terrible leader today, but there's no shortage of terrible leaders, and that's no reason for a new cold war. It's pathetic how many Democrats are suddenly anti Russia since the Democrats used that to try to deflect from the Wikileaks e-mails. The Democrats have really become everything I hate about Republicans.

I don't get it; the Russians hacked them. Are they supposed to respond to that with kisses and roses? How do you think the GOP would respond if the Russians hacked the RNC and flipped the election to the Democrats, while the Democratic campaign was in touch with the Russians, and the Democratic nominee asked Russia to hack the Republican nominee? The Democrats didn't start any beef with Russia this year. The Russians started a beef with the DNC.

There's no proof that the Wikileaks e-mails came from Russia. Some UK diplomat claims he got them from an American.

Do you sincerely believe it didn't come from Russia? If someone put a gun to your head, and your life depended on getting the right answer, you would really claim it was an American, and not Russia?

We don't know for sure, and even if it was from Russia, the release of some factual e-mails that showed that the DNC was doing what Bernie people knew it was doing anyways certainly isn't enough to start a new cold war. We're such hypocrites since we've interfered so many times with elections around the world, including to help the guy who named Putin his successor, Yeltsin. And China obviously wanted Hillary to win.

You can't even answer no to that question. All you can do is throw around a bunch of red herrings like bailing luggage from a sinking lifeboat.

Why should I have to prove that Russia wasn't involved? Did you ask every anti-war protester to prove that there wasn't WMD in Iraq?

You don't have to prove anything. But clearly you think Russia was involved, and so do I, and it's not unreasonable to want to see an American president stand up for Americans, even if they happen to be in the opposite party, when they're being attacked by a foreign power.

The release of factual information that proved what the Bernie people already knew wasn't an attack on the United State.

Hacking is a crime, and hacking by the military unit of a foreign power is certainly an attack on American citizens on American soil.

You don't start a new cold war because of alleged hacking. Did Germany start a new cold war with the US when we hacked Merkel's phone? It's ridiculous that NSA and CIA supporters are trying to play the victim here.

So...what would you do then?  No investigation of this that's conducted independently of Trump's Justice Department or a Republican majority congressional committee?  OK, "no new Cold War".  But what would you do about it instead?  Nothing?

Well, they can spend 4 years investigating to make even the BENGHAZI!!!!!! Republicans seem sane in comparison.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Why does this Russia meme resonate so much with boring middle class White women?

It's ironic when in 2012 they were all laughing at Romney for wanting a 1980s-era policy regarding Russia. A lot of it is just uncritically regurgitating NYT talking points, to be honest.

In 2012 Russia had not done any of the stuff it's hated for now. The same people who accuse the Klobuchars of wanting to 'start WW3' are also the ones who see things in black and white: as if an country must be permanently Good or Evil for all of history. Instead of looking at the Democrats' attempted friendliness towards Russia in 2012 as evidence that maybe we're not all unreasonably anti-Russia or looking to pick a fight, they take it as another black mark of inconsistency. The notion of judging a government on the basis of its actions escapes them.

I don't see things in black and white. Putin was a terrible leader in 2012, and is a terrible leader today, but there's no shortage of terrible leaders, and that's no reason for a new cold war. It's pathetic how many Democrats are suddenly anti Russia since the Democrats used that to try to deflect from the Wikileaks e-mails. The Democrats have really become everything I hate about Republicans.

I don't get it; the Russians hacked them. Are they supposed to respond to that with kisses and roses? How do you think the GOP would respond if the Russians hacked the RNC and flipped the election to the Democrats, while the Democratic campaign was in touch with the Russians, and the Democratic nominee asked Russia to hack the Republican nominee? The Democrats didn't start any beef with Russia this year. The Russians started a beef with the DNC.

There's no proof that the Wikileaks e-mails came from Russia. Some UK diplomat claims he got them from an American.

Do you sincerely believe it didn't come from Russia? If someone put a gun to your head, and your life depended on getting the right answer, you would really claim it was an American, and not Russia?

We don't know for sure, and even if it was from Russia, the release of some factual e-mails that showed that the DNC was doing what Bernie people knew it was doing anyways certainly isn't enough to start a new cold war. We're such hypocrites since we've interfered so many times with elections around the world, including to help the guy who named Putin his successor, Yeltsin. And China obviously wanted Hillary to win.

You can't even answer no to that question. All you can do is throw around a bunch of red herrings like bailing luggage from a sinking lifeboat.

Why should I have to prove that Russia wasn't involved? Did you ask every anti-war protester to prove that there wasn't WMD in Iraq?

You don't have to prove anything. But clearly you think Russia was involved, and so do I, and it's not unreasonable to want to see an American president stand up for Americans, even if they happen to be in the opposite party, when they're being attacked by a foreign power.

The release of factual information that proved what the Bernie people already knew wasn't an attack on the United State.

Hacking is a crime, and hacking by the military unit of a foreign power is certainly an attack on American citizens on American soil.

You don't start a new cold war because of alleged hacking. Did Germany start a new cold war with the US when we hacked Merkel's phone? It's ridiculous that NSA and CIA supporters are trying to play the victim here.

So...what would you do then?  No investigation of this that's conducted independently of Trump's Justice Department or a Republican majority congressional committee?  OK, "no new Cold War".  But what would you do about it instead?  Nothing?

Well, they can spend 4 years investigating to make even the BENGHAZI!!!!!! Republicans seem sane in comparison.

Not sure what this is supposed to mean.  We should stop investigating scandals that involve the POTUS because the Republicans made a farce of the Benghazi investigation?

This is all to deflect from the content of some e-mails released by Wikileaks that were factual and had nothing to do with national security.