When will the U.S. have its first Latino President?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 12, 2024, 03:33:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  When will the U.S. have its first Latino President?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Go.
#1
Before 2020
 
#2
2020-2029
 
#3
2030-2039
 
#4
2040-2049
 
#5
After 2049
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 14

Author Topic: When will the U.S. have its first Latino President?  (Read 3360 times)
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 25, 2009, 10:25:51 PM »

I'd say 2030-2039. I just don't see any viable potential Latino candidates for President in the next two decades, except maybe for Brian Sandoval.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2009, 04:31:24 PM »

Anyone?
Logged
hcallega
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.90

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2009, 04:58:27 PM »

"I just don't see any viable potential Black candidates for President in the next two decades, except for maybe Jesse Jackson Jr."

It's impossible to say really. I would like to believe that it will happen sooner than later, but being a minority and being a new immigrant group is quite tough (see Al Smith, Joe Kennedy, etc.)
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2009, 05:09:55 PM »

"I just don't see any viable potential Black candidates for President in the next two decades, except for maybe Jesse Jackson Jr."

It's impossible to say really. I would like to believe that it will happen sooner than later, but being a minority and being a new immigrant group is quite tough (see Al Smith, Joe Kennedy, etc.)

Go tell that to Barack Hussein Obama.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2009, 09:45:43 PM »

2020-2029 or 2030-2039.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2009, 10:59:53 PM »

You know, I really don't understand why Bill Richardson didn't get the nomination. He was relatively moderate, had one of the most impressive resumes out of either side, and more importantly, had executive experience. Was it just that Clinton/Obama/Edwards sucked up too much oxygen?
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 27, 2009, 11:39:22 PM »

You know, I really don't understand why Bill Richardson didn't get the nomination. He was relatively moderate, had one of the most impressive resumes out of either side, and more importantly, had executive experience. Was it just that Clinton/Obama/Edwards sucked up too much oxygen?

Yes, the fact that those three sucked up too much oxygen as well as the fact that people wanted a celebrity President (Clinton and Obama both fit the bill). Also Richardson had serious fundraising problems and was not very charismatic, and both of those things are a death sentence to almost any campaign.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2009, 12:17:32 AM »

I disagree, I find Richardson very charismatic.

Bill Richardson had the air sucked out of him, with Obama, Clinton, and Edwards, there was no place to move up. Later polls showed him on the verge of overtaking Edwards -- but this was not probable.

Had Obama not ran, he could have found a niche and took some of the electorate. However, there were too many high-profile candidates and that made it impossible for him to move up.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,370
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2009, 10:45:13 AM »

Richardson's main forte was foreign policy, which progressively became a back seat issue between 2006 and 2008.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 01, 2010, 01:21:52 PM »

Richardson's main forte was foreign policy, which progressively became a back seat issue between 2006 and 2008.

Even if foreign policy was the most important issue, I seriously doubt he'd win or come anywhere close to winning the Democratic nomination in 2008.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2010, 04:09:49 PM »

On the Republican side... Rubio. That would likely be in the twenties or thirties.


On the Democratic side... *shrugs.*

I really don't see much a of a field right now.
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 01, 2010, 04:47:31 PM »

By 2030 at the latest. I really don't think there's any counterpressure against the concept today, provided the candidate is sufficiently Anglicized.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 14 queries.